From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14935 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 14:32:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14911 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 14:32:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 14:32:30 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D693D37; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:32:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CC8137D.6050809@cygnus.com> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:32:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020424 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" Cc: shebs@apple.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: which patches to review References: <20020423.220943.39181580.davem@redhat.com> <3CC6D4E2.E5858735@apple.com> <3CC6E84D.2090403@cygnus.com> <20020424.103856.00478620.davem@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01012.txt.bz2 > From: Andrew Cagney > Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:15:57 -0400 > > Here, you're mistaken. > > He isn't %100 wrong. I've been asked repeatedly to basically > multi-arch the Sparc targets out the wazoo to get the Linux > Sparc bits in. One of GDB's overriding objectives it to get everything multi-arch. To that end: Post 5.0, every new architecture has to be mult-arched Post 5.1, every addition to an existing architecture has to be mult-arch enabled As acceptence criteria, they are simple and transparent. I don't think me stiching up some sort of cosy deal where you were some how excempted from this would go down very well :-) Andrew