Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>]

> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:29:54PM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> 
>> Well, I am attaching the DejaGnu changes for KFAILs.
>> 
>> Rob: can you please take a look, specially in the documentation
>> changes and see if they are fit for the master repository?
>> 
>> Michael Chastain: Will you be willing to help me test this?
>> I've tried it and it seems to work.  Yours scripts must also
>> be happy with it.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Fernnado
>> 
>> 
>> P.S.: I was trying to find some test to try the setup_kfail on.  I went
>> looking for the setup_xfail *-*-* calls but most don't have any comment
>> why they are marked like that.  Then I've tried looking for the FAILs
>> and see if I could find a bug entry for those -- but it is not a
>> trivial task.  I guess we will need everybody's help and memories to
>> gradually have things properly documented and related to the bug
>> entries.
> 
> 
> Looks good to me.  Fernando, could I persuade you to write up a
> GDB-specific list of what each of the DejaGNU result codes is meant to
> cover?  We could stick it in testsuite/ somewhere.

I had a similar suggestion in mind but not ``in testsuite/ somewhere''. 
  See:
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_16.html#SEC154

(just making a note that testsuite/gdb.gdb/ isn't documented)
Andrew