From: Rob Savoye <rob@welcomehome.org>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il, rob@welcomehome.org, ac131313@cygnus.com,
drow@mvista.com, fnasser@redhat.com,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 07:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020409085842.B11086@welcomehome.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200204081733.g38HXsf03252@duracef.shout.net>; from Michael Elizabeth Chastain on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 12:33:54PM -0500
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 12:33:54PM -0500, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> Now there is an open ended question. I'll ramble on it for a while.
Really, I might have stepped in a deep one there... :-) I was thinking of
changes the XML format, but these are mostly good suggestions.
> ERRORs and WARNINGs: it would help if all ERRORs and WARNINGs went
> through report_test and got treated like the other results, including
> printing the name of the current test script. Right now I pick this up
> when I am lexing the gdb.sum file.
This is probably a good idea.
> Duplicate test names: we have as many as 30 tests in the same file
> with the same name (often named "continue"). Right now I add sequence
> numbers to this when I am lexing the gdb.sum file:
> It would be nice if DejaGnu did this automatically.
Um, I don't think it's the responsibility of DejaGnu to work around a
poor programming practice.
> TIMEOUT: I would like to have a new test result of TIMEOUT for a test
> that times out. A TIMEOUT often indicates that gdb has crashed, and is
> much more serious than an ordinary FAIL.
If GDB has crashed, this is supposed to be UNRESOLVED, according to POSIX.
UNRESOLVED is a test case that can't be finished, and needs a human to look
at it. UNTESTED is when there isn't support in the underlying OS or
hardware to run a test case.
> Split gdb.log file: when I look at gdb.log, I am usually interested in
> just one test script. So I'd like to have a directory of gdb.log files,
> one per each test script. I don't need the giant log.
Hum... I might try that. Mind you, the log files were more for debugging
purposes, than analysing them for test results.
> features to add more stuff to the log file (like a uuid, the email
> address of the person who ran the test, the version of binutils and
> gcc used when testing gdb, and lots of stuff like that).
Most of this is GDB testing specific, but I'll see what I can do. I can
probably add an "output_hook", that lets test suites add their own info
to the log.
> All of this stuff is just me; the gdb group hasn't talked this over
> and reached any kind of consensus yet.
Any changes I make have to work generically, since the gdb team is a
only part of the DejaGnu user community.
- rob -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-09 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-08 10:34 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-08 11:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-09 7:50 ` Rob Savoye [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-09 9:13 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-09 9:34 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 11:56 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-08 9:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-07 18:41 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-07 9:10 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-06 14:40 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-05 17:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-05 16:51 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-05 9:53 RFC: KFAILs [Was: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp] Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-05 16:32 ` RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch Fernando Nasser
2002-04-05 17:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-07 16:25 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-05 17:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-05 17:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-08 8:37 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-04-07 16:29 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-07 22:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-08 8:22 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 8:52 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-04-08 9:01 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 8:41 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-04-08 9:00 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 13:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-08 16:21 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 16:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-08 16:48 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 16:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-08 17:09 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 23:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-09 7:38 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 23:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-09 7:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020409085842.B11086@welcomehome.org \
--to=rob@welcomehome.org \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mec@shout.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox