From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
To: fnasser@redhat.com
Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, drow@mvista.com,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, rob@welcomehome.org
Subject: Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 14:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200204062239.g36MdAT23737@duracef.shout.net> (raw)
I have preliminary results. On my full test bed (30 configurations,
native i686-pc-linux-gnu), there is no significant difference in
the gdb.sum files produced.
The "before" set is tcl 8.3.4 + expect 5.33 + dejagnu 1.4.2.
The "after" set is tcl 8.3.4 + expect 5.33 + dejagnu 1.4.2 + fn kfail patch.
Later this weekend, I will pick two or three of the configurations at
random and look carefully at every difference in gdb.log. There is a lot
of noise to wade through (machine addresses and process id's different
from run to run).
Also I will actually proofread the code. So far I just skimmed it.
Michael C
next reply other threads:[~2002-04-06 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-06 14:40 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-09 9:13 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-09 9:34 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 11:56 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-08 10:34 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-08 11:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-09 7:50 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 9:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-07 18:41 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-07 9:10 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-05 17:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-05 16:51 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-05 9:53 RFC: KFAILs [Was: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp] Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-05 16:32 ` RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch Fernando Nasser
2002-04-05 17:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-07 16:25 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-05 17:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-05 17:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-08 8:37 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-04-07 16:29 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-07 22:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-08 8:22 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 8:52 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-04-08 9:01 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 8:41 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-04-08 9:00 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 13:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-08 16:21 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 16:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-08 16:48 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 16:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-08 17:09 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 23:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-09 7:38 ` Rob Savoye
2002-04-08 23:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-09 7:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200204062239.g36MdAT23737@duracef.shout.net \
--to=mec@shout.net \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=rob@welcomehome.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox