From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16145 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2002 01:40:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16138 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2002 01:40:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2002 01:40:50 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B283CA6; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 20:40:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3CAE5220.8090001@cygnus.com> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 17:40:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, fnasser@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch References: <200204051753.g35HrUn23328@duracef.shout.net> <3CAE4182.BED29D4D@redhat.com> <20020405201029.A6868@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:29:54PM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote: > >> Well, I am attaching the DejaGnu changes for KFAILs. >> >> Rob: can you please take a look, specially in the documentation >> changes and see if they are fit for the master repository? >> >> Michael Chastain: Will you be willing to help me test this? >> I've tried it and it seems to work. Yours scripts must also >> be happy with it. >> >> Best regards, >> Fernnado >> >> >> P.S.: I was trying to find some test to try the setup_kfail on. I went >> looking for the setup_xfail *-*-* calls but most don't have any comment >> why they are marked like that. Then I've tried looking for the FAILs >> and see if I could find a bug entry for those -- but it is not a >> trivial task. I guess we will need everybody's help and memories to >> gradually have things properly documented and related to the bug >> entries. > > > Looks good to me. Fernando, could I persuade you to write up a > GDB-specific list of what each of the DejaGNU result codes is meant to > cover? We could stick it in testsuite/ somewhere. I had a similar suggestion in mind but not ``in testsuite/ somewhere''. See: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_16.html#SEC154 (just making a note that testsuite/gdb.gdb/ isn't documented) Andrew