From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@cygnus.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] gdb extension for Harvard architectures
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 14:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BBB8385.90607@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nplmiso25w.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
>
> (This is a suggested enhancement to Michael's patch; I think it's a
> step forward as is.)
Jim, no one, so far, has disputed this.
> Instead of using bits, what if we added a new `const char *' field to
> `struct type'? Its value would be a string indicating the name of the
> space qualifier applied to the type, or zero indicating the default.
> The set of permitted space names would be determined by the
> architecture, following some basic conventions (like `data' and
> `code'). There would be a gdbarch method like this:
What are the rules that apply when the user wishes to compare two such
space strings? strcmp() or ==?
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-03 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-28 13:07 Michael Snyder
2001-09-28 13:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 10:41 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 11:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-10-03 11:12 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 11:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 11:49 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 14:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 14:14 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 14:31 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2001-10-03 16:14 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-04 11:44 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-04 16:28 ` Jim Blandy
2001-09-28 17:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-09-28 17:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-02 12:59 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-02 14:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-02 15:09 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-02 16:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 10:10 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 12:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 15:08 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-10 0:56 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-09 23:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-10 10:53 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-10 11:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-10 12:15 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-10 12:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-10 0:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 11:11 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-04 12:08 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-04 13:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-08 10:36 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-10 1:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-05 11:34 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-02 16:14 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-02 17:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-02 17:31 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-02 19:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 12:41 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 12:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 16:13 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 16:51 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2001-10-03 10:55 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 11:06 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 11:51 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 12:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 16:54 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 14:33 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 14:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 16:17 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-04 13:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-10 0:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-10 10:56 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 14:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-04 11:49 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 10:49 ` Michael Snyder
2001-09-29 2:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-10-02 19:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 14:04 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BBB8385.90607@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@cygnus.com \
--cc=msnyder@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox