Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] gdb extension for Harvard architectures
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BB5195F.6050603@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BB512A9.6050801@cygnus.com>

> What about expressions.
> 
> Consider
>     (gdb) print (char *) function
> 
> should that return:
> 
>     (@data char *) ...
> or (@code char *) ...

Oops, pressed the wrong button ...

My question here is, should the address space be propogated through a 
type conversion (when it isn't explicitly specified)?

The user might have the expression:

	x/i function

and then enter

	x/w function

Both will examine the same memory location.  The user could then try to 
manipulate that data with:

	print *(int*)function

however, depending on the interpretation of the expression (I don't 
believe ISO C defines the semantics of this) you could end up printing a 
value from a completly different address space.

Would it be better if the cast operator, by default, preserved the 
address space of the pointer being cast?

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2001-09-28 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-28 13:07 Michael Snyder
2001-09-28 13:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 10:41   ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 11:06     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-10-03 11:12       ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 11:19         ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 11:49           ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 14:38             ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 14:14     ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 14:31       ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 16:14         ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-04 11:44       ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-04 16:28         ` Jim Blandy
2001-09-28 17:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-09-28 17:44   ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2001-10-02 12:59     ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-02 14:13       ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-02 15:09         ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-02 16:58           ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 10:10             ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 12:22               ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 15:08                 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-10  0:56                   ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-09 23:34               ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-10 10:53                 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-10 11:17                   ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-10 12:15                     ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-10 12:31                       ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-10  0:16               ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 11:11             ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-04 12:08             ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-04 13:13               ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-08 10:36                 ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-10  1:25                   ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-05 11:34                     ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-02 16:14         ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-02 17:16           ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-02 17:31             ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-02 19:09               ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 12:41         ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 12:52           ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 16:13             ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 16:51             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2001-10-03 10:55     ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 11:06       ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 11:51         ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 12:17           ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 16:54             ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 14:33         ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 14:44           ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 16:17             ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-04 13:16               ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-10  0:45               ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-10 10:56                 ` Jim Blandy
2001-10-03 14:48           ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-04 11:49             ` Michael Snyder
2001-10-03 10:49   ` Michael Snyder
2001-09-29  2:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-10-02 19:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-03 14:04   ` Jim Blandy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BB5195F.6050603@cygnus.com \
    --to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=msnyder@cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox