Re: [RFC/RFA] gdb extension for Harvard architectures

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 10:40:32AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > 
> > > + extern char *
> > > + address_space_int_to_name (int space_flag)
> > > + {
> > > +   if (space_flag & TYPE_FLAG_CODE_SPACE)
> > > +     return "code";
> > > +   else if (space_flag & TYPE_FLAG_DATA_SPACE)
> > > +     return "data";
> > > +   else
> > > +     return NULL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > 
> > Some thoughts on the internals.
> > 
> > Should these spaces be flags or an enumeration?  I don't think being
> > able to specify space = (CODE | DATA) is meanginful.  Haveing bit masks
> > also puts a limitation on the number of spaces.
> 
> Yes, but it's a generous limitation (there are 20 more bits available).
> I'll go either way -- the trade-off is that if we don't use the "flags"
> field, we have to add a new field to the (struct type) data structure.

May I suggest:
	if ((space_flag & TYPE_FLAG_SPACE_MASK) == TYPE_FLAG_CODE_SPACE)

I'd prefer to preserve the knowledge that an object is in only one
space.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer