From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [rfa/target/doc] Print less with "set debug target 1"
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2914-Tue09Mar2004213700+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040309161826.GC27765@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:18:26 -0500)
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:18:26 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> Here's what I checked in to HEAD. Eli, I ended up rewording the
> description for clarity, and now it says "use the @code{run} command" -
> by inspecting the rest of the manual, I'm pretty sure that should stay
> @code rather than @kbd. Right?
If you refer to the name of a command, then @code is okay. But if you
say "type `SOMETHING'", then whatever you want the user to type should
be in @kbd.
Did I succeed to explain the difference between these two cases?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [rfa/target/doc] Print less with "set debug target 1"
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 19:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2914-Tue09Mar2004213700+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040309193900.0nDsA4XmugiEJjKJ7ffNuNFZ98GC5O4RVvuvq-5_HcI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040309161826.GC27765@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:18:26 -0500)
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:18:26 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> Here's what I checked in to HEAD. Eli, I ended up rewording the
> description for clarity, and now it says "use the @code{run} command" -
> by inspecting the rest of the manual, I'm pretty sure that should stay
> @code rather than @kbd. Right?
If you refer to the name of a command, then @code is okay. But if you
say "type `SOMETHING'", then whatever you want the user to type should
be in @kbd.
Did I succeed to explain the difference between these two cases?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-09 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-19 0:09 Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-06 23:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-08 22:49 ` Michael Snyder
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Michael Snyder
2004-03-09 16:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-03-09 19:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-09 19:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-07 5:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-09 0:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Michael Snyder
2004-03-08 22:48 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2914-Tue09Mar2004213700+0200-eliz@elta.co.il \
--to=eliz@elta.co.il \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox