From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17139 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2004 19:39:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17129 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 19:39:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 19:39:02 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-206-173.inter.net.il [80.230.206.173]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id BLU29805; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:38:23 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-Id: <2914-Tue09Mar2004213700+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org In-reply-to: <20040309161826.GC27765@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:18:26 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa/target/doc] Print less with "set debug target 1" Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040306230834.GA9343@nevyn.them.org> <20040309161826.GC27765@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:18:26 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Here's what I checked in to HEAD. Eli, I ended up rewording the > description for clarity, and now it says "use the @code{run} command" - > by inspecting the rest of the manual, I'm pretty sure that should stay > @code rather than @kbd. Right? If you refer to the name of a command, then @code is okay. But if you say "type `SOMETHING'", then whatever you want the user to type should be in @kbd. Did I succeed to explain the difference between these two cases? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17139 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2004 19:39:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17129 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 19:39:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 19:39:02 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-206-173.inter.net.il [80.230.206.173]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id BLU29805; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:38:23 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 19:39:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-ID: <2914-Tue09Mar2004213700+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org In-reply-to: <20040309161826.GC27765@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:18:26 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa/target/doc] Print less with "set debug target 1" Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040306230834.GA9343@nevyn.them.org> <20040309161826.GC27765@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00207.txt Message-ID: <20040309193900.0nDsA4XmugiEJjKJ7ffNuNFZ98GC5O4RVvuvq-5_HcI@z> > Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:18:26 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Here's what I checked in to HEAD. Eli, I ended up rewording the > description for clarity, and now it says "use the @code{run} command" - > by inspecting the rest of the manual, I'm pretty sure that should stay > @code rather than @kbd. Right? If you refer to the name of a command, then @code is okay. But if you say "type `SOMETHING'", then whatever you want the user to type should be in @kbd. Did I succeed to explain the difference between these two cases?