Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] gdb: Refactor 'stack.c:print_frame_info'.
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 11:18:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250923111842.4091694-6-christina.schimpe@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923111842.4091694-1-christina.schimpe@intel.com>

This patch restructures the 'stack.c:print_frame_info' function by
introducing two new functions in stack.c.  The new functions
will also be called in a later patch "gdb: Implement 'bt shadow'
subcommand to print the shadow stack backtrace."
---
 gdb/stack.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/stack.c b/gdb/stack.c
index 91ae4046ad6..40756f74a00 100644
--- a/gdb/stack.c
+++ b/gdb/stack.c
@@ -1013,6 +1013,86 @@ get_user_print_what_frame_info (std::optional<enum print_what> *what)
 	(user_frame_print_options.print_frame_info);
 }
 
+/* Return true if PRINT_WHAT is configured to print the location of a
+   frame.  */
+
+static bool
+should_print_location (print_what print_what)
+{
+  return (print_what == LOCATION
+	  || print_what == SRC_AND_LOC
+	  || print_what == LOC_AND_ADDRESS
+	  || print_what == SHORT_LOCATION);
+}
+
+/* Print the source information for PC and SAL to UIOUT.  Based on the
+   user-defined configuration disassemble-next-line, display disassembly
+   of the next source line, in addition to displaying the source line
+   itself.  Print annotations describing source file and and line number
+   based on MID_STATEMENT information.  If SHOW_ADDRESS is true, print the
+   program counter PC including, if non-empty, PC_ADDRESS_FLAGS.  */
+
+static void
+print_source (ui_out *uiout, gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc,
+	      symtab_and_line sal, bool show_address, int mid_statement,
+	      const std::string &pc_address_flags)
+{
+  if (sal.symtab == nullptr)
+    {
+      /* If disassemble-next-line is set to auto or on and doesn't have
+	 the line debug messages for $pc, output the next instruction.  */
+      if (disassemble_next_line == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO
+	  || disassemble_next_line == AUTO_BOOLEAN_TRUE)
+	do_gdb_disassembly (gdbarch, 1, pc, pc + 1);
+
+      /* If we do not have symtab information, we cannot print any source
+	 line and must return here.  */
+      return;
+    }
+
+  if (annotation_level > 0
+      && annotate_source_line (sal.symtab, sal.line, mid_statement, pc))
+    {
+      /* The call to ANNOTATE_SOURCE_LINE already printed the annotation
+	 for this source line, so we avoid the two cases below and do not
+	 print the actual source line.  The documentation for annotations
+	 makes it clear that the source line annotation is printed
+	 __instead__ of printing the source line, not as well as.
+
+	 However, if we fail to print the source line, which usually means
+	 either the source file is missing, or the requested line is out
+	 of range of the file, then we don't print the source annotation,
+	 and will pass through the "normal" print source line code below,
+	 the expectation is that this code will print an appropriate
+	 error.  */
+    }
+  else if (deprecated_print_frame_info_listing_hook)
+    deprecated_print_frame_info_listing_hook (sal.symtab, sal.line,
+					      sal.line + 1, 0);
+  else
+    {
+      /* We used to do this earlier, but that is clearly wrong.  This
+	 function is used by many different parts of gdb, including
+	 normal_stop in infrun.c, which uses this to print out the current
+	 PC when we stepi/nexti into the middle of a source line.  Only
+	 the command line really wants this behavior.  Other UIs probably
+	 would like the ability to decide for themselves if it is
+	 desired.  */
+      if (show_address)
+	{
+	  print_pc (uiout, gdbarch, pc_address_flags, pc);
+	  uiout->text ("\t");
+	}
+
+      print_source_lines (sal.symtab, sal.line, sal.line + 1, 0);
+    }
+
+    /* If disassemble-next-line is set to on and there is line debug
+       messages, output assembly codes for next line.  */
+    if (disassemble_next_line == AUTO_BOOLEAN_TRUE)
+      do_gdb_disassembly (gdbarch, -1, sal.pc, sal.end);
+}
+
 /* Print information about frame FRAME.  The output is format according
    to PRINT_LEVEL and PRINT_WHAT and PRINT_ARGS.  For the meaning of
    PRINT_WHAT, see enum print_what comments in frame.h.
@@ -1029,8 +1109,6 @@ do_print_frame_info (struct ui_out *uiout, const frame_print_options &fp_opts,
 		     int set_current_sal)
 {
   struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (frame);
-  int source_print;
-  int location_print;
 
   if (!current_uiout->is_mi_like_p ()
       && fp_opts.print_frame_info != print_frame_info_auto)
@@ -1101,75 +1179,26 @@ do_print_frame_info (struct ui_out *uiout, const frame_print_options &fp_opts,
      to get the line containing FRAME->pc.  */
   symtab_and_line sal = find_frame_sal (frame);
 
-  location_print = (print_what == LOCATION
-		    || print_what == SRC_AND_LOC
-		    || print_what == LOC_AND_ADDRESS
-		    || print_what == SHORT_LOCATION);
-  if (location_print || !sal.symtab)
-    print_frame (uiout, fp_opts, frame, print_level,
-		 print_what, print_args, sal);
-
-  source_print = (print_what == SRC_LINE || print_what == SRC_AND_LOC);
+  if (should_print_location (print_what) || sal.symtab == nullptr)
+    print_frame (uiout, fp_opts, frame, print_level, print_what,
+		 print_args, sal);
 
-  /* If disassemble-next-line is set to auto or on and doesn't have
-     the line debug messages for $pc, output the next instruction.  */
-  if ((disassemble_next_line == AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO
-       || disassemble_next_line == AUTO_BOOLEAN_TRUE)
-      && source_print && !sal.symtab)
-    do_gdb_disassembly (get_frame_arch (frame), 1,
-			get_frame_pc (frame), get_frame_pc (frame) + 1);
-
-  if (source_print && sal.symtab)
+  if (print_what == SRC_LINE || print_what == SRC_AND_LOC)
     {
       int mid_statement = ((print_what == SRC_LINE)
 			   && frame_show_address (frame, sal));
-      if (annotation_level > 0
-	  && annotate_source_line (sal.symtab, sal.line, mid_statement,
-				   get_frame_pc (frame)))
-	{
-	  /* The call to ANNOTATE_SOURCE_LINE already printed the
-	     annotation for this source line, so we avoid the two cases
-	     below and do not print the actual source line.  The
-	     documentation for annotations makes it clear that the source
-	     line annotation is printed __instead__ of printing the source
-	     line, not as well as.
-
-	     However, if we fail to print the source line, which usually
-	     means either the source file is missing, or the requested
-	     line is out of range of the file, then we don't print the
-	     source annotation, and will pass through the "normal" print
-	     source line code below, the expectation is that this code
-	     will print an appropriate error.  */
-	}
-      else if (deprecated_print_frame_info_listing_hook)
-	deprecated_print_frame_info_listing_hook (sal.symtab, sal.line,
-						  sal.line + 1, 0);
-      else
-	{
-	  struct value_print_options opts;
-
-	  get_user_print_options (&opts);
-	  /* We used to do this earlier, but that is clearly
-	     wrong.  This function is used by many different
-	     parts of gdb, including normal_stop in infrun.c,
-	     which uses this to print out the current PC
-	     when we stepi/nexti into the middle of a source
-	     line.  Only the command line really wants this
-	     behavior.  Other UIs probably would like the
-	     ability to decide for themselves if it is desired.  */
-	  if (opts.addressprint && mid_statement)
-	    {
-	      print_pc (uiout, gdbarch, frame, get_frame_pc (frame));
-	      uiout->text ("\t");
-	    }
 
-	  print_source_lines (sal.symtab, sal.line, sal.line + 1, 0);
-	}
+      value_print_options opts;
+      get_user_print_options (&opts);
+
+      const bool print_address = opts.addressprint && mid_statement;
+
+      std::string pc_address_flags
+	= gdbarch_get_pc_address_flags (gdbarch, frame, get_frame_pc (frame));
+
+      print_source (uiout, gdbarch, get_frame_pc (frame), sal,
+		    print_address, mid_statement, pc_address_flags);
 
-      /* If disassemble-next-line is set to on and there is line debug
-	 messages, output assembly codes for next line.  */
-      if (disassemble_next_line == AUTO_BOOLEAN_TRUE)
-	do_gdb_disassembly (get_frame_arch (frame), -1, sal.pc, sal.end);
     }
 
   if (set_current_sal)
-- 
2.34.1

Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Sean Fennelly, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Tiffany Doon Silva
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-23 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-23 11:18 [PATCH 0/9] Add new command to print the shadow stack backtrace Christina Schimpe
2025-09-23 11:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] gdb: Generalize handling of the shadow stack pointer Christina Schimpe
2025-10-31  1:31   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-11-17 11:18     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-11-26  4:19       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-12-30 10:39         ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-09-23 11:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] gdb: Refactor 'stack.c:print_frame' Christina Schimpe
2025-10-03 20:05   ` Tom Tromey
2025-09-23 11:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] gdb: Introduce 'stack.c:print_pc' function without frame argument Christina Schimpe
2025-10-03 19:56   ` Tom Tromey
2025-09-23 11:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] gdb: Refactor 'find_symbol_funname' and 'info_frame_command_core' in stack.c Christina Schimpe
2025-10-03 19:55   ` Tom Tromey
2025-09-23 11:18 ` Christina Schimpe [this message]
2025-10-03 20:03   ` [PATCH 5/9] gdb: Refactor 'stack.c:print_frame_info' Tom Tromey
2025-09-23 11:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] gdb: Implement 'bt shadow' to print the shadow stack backtrace Christina Schimpe
2025-09-23 11:47   ` Eli Zaretskii
2025-09-25 11:06     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-09-25 13:19       ` Eli Zaretskii
2025-09-25 14:58         ` Simon Marchi
2025-09-26  7:45           ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-10-29 15:05             ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-10-29 15:28               ` Guinevere Larsen
2025-11-03 19:47                 ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-11-04 11:53                   ` Guinevere Larsen
2025-11-05 16:33                     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-10-13  1:17       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-10-13  7:19         ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-10-31  4:39           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-11-06 14:23             ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-10-03 20:15   ` Tom Tromey
2025-10-12 19:45     ` Schimpe, Christina
2026-02-19 17:24       ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-02 12:24         ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-10-31  4:02   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-11-17 20:14     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-11-26  4:07       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-11-26 16:29         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-01-22 17:04           ` Schimpe, Christina
2026-03-06  2:35             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-01-15 14:05         ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-09-23 11:18 ` [PATCH 7/9] gdb: Provide gdbarch hook to distinguish shadow stack backtrace elements Christina Schimpe
2025-09-23 11:49   ` Eli Zaretskii
2025-09-25 11:10     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-11-02 21:20       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-11-12 17:28         ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-11-16 18:39           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-11-17 11:51             ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-09-23 11:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] gdb: Implement the hook 'is_no_return_shadow_stack_address' for amd64 linux Christina Schimpe
2025-11-26  4:22   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-09-23 11:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] gdb, mi: Add -shadow-stack-list-frames command Christina Schimpe
2025-09-23 11:53   ` Eli Zaretskii
2025-09-25 11:32     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-10-03 20:17   ` Tom Tromey
2025-10-12 19:54     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-10-13  0:06       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-11-26  4:26   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-01-22 17:01     ` Schimpe, Christina
2026-03-06  2:44       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-09-25 11:46 ` [PATCH 0/9] Add new command to print the shadow stack backtrace Schimpe, Christina
2025-10-08  1:46   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-10-13  1:18     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-10-13  6:34       ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-10-29 14:52         ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-10-31  0:47           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-12-30 10:16             ` Schimpe, Christina
2026-03-06  2:30               ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-12  9:53                 ` Schimpe, Christina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250923111842.4091694-6-christina.schimpe@intel.com \
    --to=christina.schimpe@intel.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox