Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Milica Matic <milica.matic@htecgroup.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	Djordje Todorovic <Djordje.Todorovic@htecgroup.com>,
	Milos Kalicanin <milos.kalicanin@htecgroup.com>,
	"simark@simark.ca" <simark@simark.ca>,
	"cfu@wavecomp.com" <cfu@wavecomp.com>,
	"aburgess@redhat.com" <aburgess@redhat.com>,
	"macro@orcam.me.uk" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH^11] gdb: mips: Add MIPSR6 support
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:10:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250211131058.4962d6f6@f41-zbm-amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250210172801.43302-1-milica.matic@htecgroup.com>

Hi Milica,

On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:28:12 +0000
Milica Matic <milica.matic@htecgroup.com> wrote:

> Introduce new instruction encodings from Release 6 of the MIPS
> architecture [1]. Support breakpoints and single stepping with
> compact branches, forbidden slots, new branch instruction and
> new atomic load-store instruction encodings.
> 
> Changes from v10: Apply suggestions provided by Kevin Buettner.
> Additionaly, format mips-tdep.c code as described on links:
> https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20GDB-C-Coding-Standards
> https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Comments
> 
> [1] "MIPS64 Architecture for Programmers Volume II-A: The MIPS64
>     Instruction Set Reference Manual", Document Number: MD00087,
>     Revision 6.06, December 15, 2016, Section 3 "The MIPS64
>     Instruction Set", pp. 42-530
> https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/downloads-mips/documents/MD00087-2B-MIPS64BIS-AFP-6.06.pdf
> 2025-02-10
> Andrew Bennett  <andrew.bennett@imgtec.com>
> Matthew Fortune  <matthew.fortune@mips.com>
> Faraz Shahbazker  <fshahbazker@wavecomp.com>

The code formatting looks good to me now.

Additionally, I don't see anything obviously wrong with the MIPSR6
support that's been added.  That said, I'm not especially
knowledgeable about MIPS these days, so I ask that you wait a few days
for other maintainers to weigh in before pushing this patch.

Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-11 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-10 17:28 Milica Matic
2025-02-11 20:10 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2025-02-11 20:45   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-02-19 13:05     ` Milica Matic
2025-02-19 13:14     ` Milica Matic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250211131058.4962d6f6@f41-zbm-amd \
    --to=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=Djordje.Todorovic@htecgroup.com \
    --cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=cfu@wavecomp.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=milica.matic@htecgroup.com \
    --cc=milos.kalicanin@htecgroup.com \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox