From: "Simon Marchi (Code Review)" <gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [review] Add a dependency on import/Makefile and config.h
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114053624.A031D20AF6@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gerrit.1573612444000.I6a2c4d41cf4f0e21d5c813197bad63ed5c08e408@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
Simon Marchi has posted comments on this change.
Change URL: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/622
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
> > > Can you explain quickly the logic of this? I am not completely aware of what generates what in this system, so if you could explain at high level what happens between importing a new gnulib module, and the Makefile/config.h getting re-generated, it would help.
> >
> > Sure. So if a new module is imported, it will likely change what #defines get defined, which means config.h needs to be regenerated. Also, import/Makefile.in sets various variables similar to those defines such as REPLACE_STRERROR_R, and so it needs to be regenerated as well (those variables are used to generate headers like string.h)
> >
> > But nothing currently ensures that those two get regenerated. Hence these new dependencies. all-lib was already depending on import/Makefile, presumably for this purpose, but does not seem to be used.
>
> Sorry, to clarify, these are the steps that cause issues:
> - Have an existing GDB build <-- important
> - Run update-gnulib
> - Run make in your build directory <-- this is now using the old config.h and import/Makefile
Ok, so I'm able to reproduce the problem. However, I'm not convinced yet your solution is the best way (although it works). I was really wondering why import/Makefile wasn't getting magically re-generated, since it's managed by automake, and it led me to the solution explained below.
It's a little weird, because this is an automake project, where the top-level Makefile isn't managed by automake. But we re-invent a bunch of things that automake does.
I "isolated" the problem to this simpler case that usually works in a normal automake project, but does not work here:
$ pwd
/home/simark/build/binutils-gdb/gnulib/import
$ touch ../config.status /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gnulib/import/Makefile.in
$ make Makefile
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/simark/build/binutils-gdb/gnulib'
# Regenerate the Makefile.
CONFIG_FILES="Makefile" \
CONFIG_COMMANDS= \
CONFIG_HEADERS= \
/bin/sh config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/simark/build/binutils-gdb/gnulib'
make: 'Makefile' is up to date.
When both config.status and import/Makefile.in are newer than import/Makefile, make goes into the top-level directory and seemingly re-generates only the top-level Makefile. That looks weird and incorrect. import/Makefile is still not re-generated.
The rule in import/Makefile to re-generate itself is:
Makefile: $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(top_builddir)/config.status
@case '$?' in \
*config.status*) \
cd $(top_builddir) && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) am--refresh;; \
*) \
echo ' cd $(top_builddir) && $(SHELL) ./config.status $(subdir)/$@ $(am__depfiles_maybe)'; \
cd $(top_builddir) && $(SHELL) ./config.status $(subdir)/$@ $(am__depfiles_maybe);; \
esac;
Essentially, when import/Makefile is older than config.status, I guess it's the sign that all config files are outdated, so it calls the am--refresh target of the top-level Makefile.
This rule does nothing, but because of some magic I don't understand, the top-level Makefile is also checked against it dependencies. Because it is older than config.status, it is rebuilt using
Makefile: Makefile.in config.status
# Regenerate the Makefile.
CONFIG_FILES="Makefile" \
CONFIG_COMMANDS= \
CONFIG_HEADERS= \
$(SHELL) config.status
And this only rebuilds the top-level Makefile, which is the behavior we observe.
I looked at a top-level Makefile generated by automake, and this is what I found:
Makefile: $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(top_builddir)/config.status
@case '$?' in \
*config.status*) \
echo ' $(SHELL) ./config.status'; \
$(SHELL) ./config.status;; \
*) \
echo ' cd $(top_builddir) && $(SHELL) ./config.status $@ $(am__maybe_remake_depfiles)'; \
cd $(top_builddir) && $(SHELL) ./config.status $@ $(am__maybe_remake_depfiles);; \
esac;
When the top-level Makefile is re-generated and older than config.status, it re-generates all the config files, not just itself.
So if we copy automake's behavior, it should work (at least my local testing here seemed to work). When you run update-gnulib.sh, then type "make" in the top-level (we generally don't type make in import/, so this is a more realistic scenario), it will re-generate configure, which will cause config.status to get re-generated, which will cause the top-level Makefile to get re-generated. And if that rules re-generates all config files (including import/Makefile and config.h), we are fine.
Writing all this made me think: could we just write that top-level Makefile using automake and stop trying to re-invent it?
--
Gerrit-Project: binutils-gdb
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6a2c4d41cf4f0e21d5c813197bad63ed5c08e408
Gerrit-Change-Number: 622
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:36:24 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 2:34 Christian Biesinger (Code Review)
2019-11-13 16:15 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-11-13 16:31 ` Christian Biesinger (Code Review)
2019-11-13 16:32 ` Christian Biesinger (Code Review)
2019-11-14 5:36 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review) [this message]
2019-11-15 0:28 ` Christian Biesinger (Code Review)
2019-11-15 0:31 ` [review v2] Generate gnulib's toplevel Makefile.in using automake Christian Biesinger (Code Review)
2019-11-15 1:06 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-11-15 1:12 ` [review v3] " Christian Biesinger (Code Review)
2019-11-15 1:13 ` Christian Biesinger (Code Review)
2019-11-15 1:16 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-11-15 1:24 ` [review v4] " Christian Biesinger (Code Review)
2019-11-15 3:08 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-11-15 13:20 ` Tom Tromey (Code Review)
2019-11-15 18:23 ` [review v5] " Christian Biesinger (Code Review)
2019-11-15 18:26 ` Christian Biesinger (Code Review)
2019-11-15 18:31 ` Tom Tromey (Code Review)
2019-11-15 19:03 ` [pushed] " Sourceware to Gerrit sync (Code Review)
2019-11-15 19:03 ` Sourceware to Gerrit sync (Code Review)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191114053624.A031D20AF6@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
--to=gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
--cc=cbiesinger@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=gnutoolchain-gerrit@osci.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox