From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
GNU Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
Andrey Bacherov <bandvig@mail.ru>,
Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/11] OpenRISC orfpx64a32 and openrisc spec 1.3 support
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190612131212.GD2358@lianli.shorne-pla.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a597b99a-bf5c-0c6b-bc8a-c81faf856f1d@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 05:02:43PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Stafford,
>
> > Its been a while since v2, but we have been busy changing direction a bit.
> > Instead of just adding the orfpx64a32 extension support we have created a new
> > architecture specification [0] and this series includes some of those changes.
>
> The binutils parts of the patch series are approved - please apply.
Thanks for the review,
I will apply once I get the go ahead on the cgen patches.
-Stafford
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-08 21:32 Stafford Horne
2019-06-08 21:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] cpu/or1k: Document no branch delay slot architectures and l.adrp Stafford Horne
2019-06-08 21:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] cpu/or1k: Add support for orfp64a32 spec Stafford Horne
2019-06-08 21:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] cpu/or1k: Define unordered comparisons Stafford Horne
2019-06-08 21:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] cpu/or1k: Update fpu compare symbols to imply set flag Stafford Horne
2019-06-08 21:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] sim/testsuite/or1k: Add test for 64-bit fpu operations Stafford Horne
2019-06-08 21:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] sim/or1k: Regenerate sim Stafford Horne
2019-06-08 21:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] opcodes/or1k: Regenerate opcodes Stafford Horne
2019-06-08 21:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] sim/common: wire up new unordered comparisons Stafford Horne
2019-06-08 21:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] sim/common: Wire in df/di conversion Stafford Horne
2019-06-10 15:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/11] OpenRISC orfpx64a32 and openrisc spec 1.3 support Nick Clifton
2019-06-10 20:51 ` Stafford Horne
2019-06-11 16:03 ` Nick Clifton
2019-06-12 13:12 ` Stafford Horne [this message]
2019-06-12 21:25 ` Stafford Horne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190612131212.GD2358@lianli.shorne-pla.net \
--to=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=bandvig@mail.ru \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=nickc@redhat.com \
--cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox