Re: [PATCHv5] aarch64: detect atomic sequences like other ll/sc architectures

[Kyle McMartin <kmcmarti@redhat.com>]

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:46:11AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > AndrewP said that the code is always LE, so why not just use
> > > BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE in this case, rather than go through
> > > byte_order_for_code?
> > > 
> > 
> > Seemed sensible to do what aarch64_analyze_prologue did, rather than
> > hard code it... I'm happy one way or another though.
> 
> Hmmm, true. It doesn't matter all that much, I think, and yours has
> indeed the advantate of consistency. I pushed your patch.
> 
> For future submissions, may I make a request? Would you mind including
> the revision log as part of the email when sending your patches? I went
> through all versions of the patch that were sent, and couldn't find
> a description of the problem. We try to have those in the revision log
> to avoid having to re-locate the patches in the mailing-list when
> searching for the reasons behind the patch. The nice side-effect of
> following this approach is that submitting the patch is just a matter
> of "git send-email"-ing it, and for me, pushing the patch is just
> a matter of "git am" + "git push" (with a possible update to add
> the ChangeLog entries).
> 

Certainly, sorry about that. Will keep this in mind for next time.

regards, Kyle