Re: [PATCHv5] aarch64: detect atomic sequences like other ll/sc architectures

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

> > AndrewP said that the code is always LE, so why not just use
> > BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE in this case, rather than go through
> > byte_order_for_code?
> > 
> 
> Seemed sensible to do what aarch64_analyze_prologue did, rather than
> hard code it... I'm happy one way or another though.

Hmmm, true. It doesn't matter all that much, I think, and yours has
indeed the advantate of consistency. I pushed your patch.

For future submissions, may I make a request? Would you mind including
the revision log as part of the email when sending your patches? I went
through all versions of the patch that were sent, and couldn't find
a description of the problem. We try to have those in the revision log
to avoid having to re-locate the patches in the mailing-list when
searching for the reasons behind the patch. The nice side-effect of
following this approach is that submitting the patch is just a matter
of "git send-email"-ing it, and for me, pushing the patch is just
a matter of "git am" + "git push" (with a possible update to add
the ChangeLog entries).

Thanks again!
-- 
Joel