From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: "Agovic, Sanimir" <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
Cc: "tromey@redhat.com" <tromey@redhat.com>,
"Boell, Keven" <keven.boell@intel.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/15] vla: evaluate operand of sizeof if its type is a vla
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140319151230.GG4282@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0377C58828D86C4588AEEC42FC3B85A7177464DE@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
> If the operand passed to sizeof evaluates to a variable length array
> type then C99 requires that the size of the operand is evaluated at
> runtime (otherwise at compile time).
>
> 1| int vla[n][m];
>
> sizeof(vla[0]) // Operand type is a variable length type, size is evaluated at runtime
> sizeof(vla[0][0]) // Operand type is an int, size is evaluated at compile time
>
> If the expression contains a side effects it is evaluated too
>
> sizeof(vla[i++]) // i gets modified as the operand is evaluated at runtime
> sizeof(vla[i++][0]) // no modifications, operand type evaluates to int
Very interesting! I guess whoever is writing ...
sizeof(vla[i++][0])
... instead of ...
sizeof(vla[i + 1][0])
... is trying to shoot himself in the foot!
Thanks for the explanation. I confess that the C RM is often somewhat
obscure to me.
> I addressed all of your issues below.
Thanks! I look forward to v6 :). Hopefully that'll be the final
iteration. FYI: I have one patch already that's dependent on your patch
series, and it has to do with handling of "ptype dynamic_sized_array"
in Ada.
Thanks!
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-19 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-06 16:27 [PATCH v5 00/15] C99 variable length array support Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-06 16:27 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] vla: support for DW_AT_count Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 16:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-12 13:51 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-03-13 15:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:27 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] vla: enable sizeof operator to work with variable length arrays Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-06 16:27 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] test: cover subranges with present DW_AT_count attribute Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 17:52 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] test: multi-dimensional c99 vla Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 17:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] vla: resolve dynamic bounds if value contents is a constant byte-sequence Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-07 10:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-07 12:27 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-02-28 17:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-12 13:40 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-03-13 16:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-19 15:35 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] type: add c99 variable length array support Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 16:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-08 6:41 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-04-08 12:49 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] test: evaluate pointers to C99 vla correctly Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 18:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] vla: enable sizeof operator for indirection Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] vla: evaluate operand of sizeof if its type is a vla Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 17:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-19 12:55 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-03-19 15:12 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] refactoring: rename create_range_type to create_static_range_type Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-27 22:03 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-28 11:02 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] test: add mi vla test Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 18:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-12 12:53 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] vla: update type from newly created value Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] vla: introduce new bound type abstraction adapt uses Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] test: basic c99 vla tests for C primitives Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 18:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] vla: print "variable length" for unresolved dynamic bounds Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-09 3:49 ` [PATCH v5 00/15] C99 variable length array support Joel Brobecker
2014-02-10 4:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-17 20:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-26 14:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-03 16:51 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-02-28 18:13 ` status update: " Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140319151230.GG4282@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keven.boell@intel.com \
--cc=sanimir.agovic@intel.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox