From: "Agovic, Sanimir" <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
To: 'Joel Brobecker' <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: "tromey@redhat.com" <tromey@redhat.com>,
"Boell, Keven" <keven.boell@intel.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 00/15] C99 variable length array support
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 16:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0377C58828D86C4588AEEC42FC3B85A717722894@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140226140539.GB4348@adacore.com>
Thanks Joel for taking care. I`m going to address your issues for the VLA patch series this week.
-Sanimir
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf
> Of Joel Brobecker
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 03:06 PM
> To: Agovic, Sanimir
> Cc: tromey@redhat.com; Boell, Keven; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/15] C99 variable length array support
>
> > > The next step for me is to test those changes against the AdaCore
> > > testsuite. I will try to schedule that early next week.
> >
> > Good news! No regression detected with our testsuite on x86_64-linux.
> > No improvement either, but that is to be expected, since we already
> > handle the dynamicity via other means (hopefully to be deprecated
> > soon).
>
> Fair warning: ISTM that this patch series is very close to approval,
> and I would really like to see this patch series go in. So I will
> start reviewing past discussion an comparing the latest version
> against past comments. If all comments have been addressed, my plan
> is to approve the patch. Please let me know if there are any objections.
>
> --
> Joel
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-06 16:27 Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-06 16:27 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] vla: enable sizeof operator to work with variable length arrays Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-06 16:27 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] vla: support for DW_AT_count Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 16:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-12 13:51 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-03-13 15:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:27 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] test: cover subranges with present DW_AT_count attribute Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 17:52 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] vla: evaluate operand of sizeof if its type is a vla Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 17:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-19 12:55 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-03-19 15:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] vla: enable sizeof operator for indirection Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] test: evaluate pointers to C99 vla correctly Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 18:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] type: add c99 variable length array support Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 16:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-08 6:41 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-04-08 12:49 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] vla: resolve dynamic bounds if value contents is a constant byte-sequence Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-07 10:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-07 12:27 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-02-28 17:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-12 13:40 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-03-13 16:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-19 15:35 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] test: multi-dimensional c99 vla Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 17:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] vla: print "variable length" for unresolved dynamic bounds Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] test: basic c99 vla tests for C primitives Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 18:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] vla: introduce new bound type abstraction adapt uses Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] vla: update type from newly created value Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] test: add mi vla test Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-28 18:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-12 12:53 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] refactoring: rename create_range_type to create_static_range_type Sanimir Agovic
2014-02-27 22:03 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-28 11:02 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-02-09 3:49 ` [PATCH v5 00/15] C99 variable length array support Joel Brobecker
2014-02-10 4:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-17 20:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-26 14:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-03 16:51 ` Agovic, Sanimir [this message]
2014-02-28 18:13 ` status update: " Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0377C58828D86C4588AEEC42FC3B85A717722894@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=sanimir.agovic@intel.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keven.boell@intel.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox