pushed: [RFA 1/2] New GDB/MI command "-info-gdb-mi-command"

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

> > gdb/ChangeLog:
> > 
> >         * mi/mi-cmds.h (mi_cmd_info_gdb_mi_command): Declare.
> >         * mi/mi-cmd-info.c (mi_cmd_info_gdb_mi_command): New function.
> >         * mi/mi-cmds.c (mi_cmds): Add -info-gdb-mi-command command.
> >         * mi/mi-main.c (mi_cmd_list_features): Add "info-gdb-mi-command"
> >         field to output of "-list-features".
> > 
> >         * NEWS: Add entry for new -info-gdb-mi-command.
> > 
> > gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
> > 
> >         * gdb.texinfo (GDB/MI Miscellaneous Commands): Document
> >         the new -info-gdb-mi-command GDB/MI command.  Document
> >         the meaning of "-info-gdb-mi-command" in the output of
> >         -list-features.
> > 
> > gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > 
> >         * gdb.mi/mi-i-cmd.exp: New file.
> > 
> > Re-tested on x86_64-linux.  OK to commit?
> > 
> 
> Looks fine to me.
> 
> (I don't have a strong opinion about the dash issue.)
> 
> > +# First, verify that the debugger correctly advertises support
> > +# for the -info-gdb-mi-command command.
> > +mi_gdb_test "-list-features" \
> > +            "\\^done,features=\\\[.*\"info-gdb-mi-command\".*\\\]" \
> > +            "-list-features should include \"info-gdb-mi-command\""
> 
> Nit, I'd suggest:
> 
>            "-list-features includes \"info-gdb-mi-command\""
> 

Thanks, Pedro. The suggestion does seem better to me too, so I applied
it. Patch now in.

-- 
Joel