From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, palves@redhat.com,
jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, ralf.corsepius@rtems.org,
vapier@gentoo.org, joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com
Subject: Re: one week to gdb-7.6 release?
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130325162524.GK5447@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83k3ov1mo0.fsf@gnu.org>
> But then why do we need an implementation in posix-hdep.c at all?
I did not mean to say that we do need an implementation in posix-hdep,
just saying that we might someday in the future - and if we do, a
comment explaining the currrent implemention would help the next person
looking at it.
> The
> code in main.c already does
>
> #ifdef __MINGW32__
> /* On Windows, argv[0] is not necessarily set to absolute form when
> GDB is found along PATH, without which relocation doesn't work. */
> gdb_program_name = windows_get_absolute_argv0 (argv[0]);
> #else
> gdb_program_name = xstrdup (argv[0]);
> #endif
>
> Is moving that to posix-hdep.c just to avoid an ifdef?
The main purpose is to move the code away out of windows-nat, which
is only linked in native debuggers, not cross ones - so that building
a cross debugger hosted on Windows will work again. Basically, your
new function is really only dependent on the host, whereas the -nat
file makes the assumption that host & target are Windows.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-25 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-20 16:09 Joel Brobecker
2013-03-20 16:14 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-20 17:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-03-20 17:08 ` Joel Sherrill
2013-03-20 17:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-23 22:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-24 0:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-03-24 0:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-25 16:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-03-25 17:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-25 18:10 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2013-03-29 8:02 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-03-29 14:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-29 19:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-04-02 18:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-04-05 13:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-04-06 6:16 ` unbreak Windows hosted cross debugger builds (was: Re: one week to gdb-7.6 release?) Pedro Alves
2013-04-06 15:41 ` unbreak Windows hosted cross debugger builds " Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-29 15:23 ` one week to gdb-7.6 release? Ralf Corsepius
2013-03-29 16:42 ` m32r sim was " Joel Sherrill
2013-03-29 17:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-03-29 19:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-03-29 20:24 ` Joel Sherrill
2013-03-29 21:44 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-04-04 13:03 ` Ralf Corsepius
2013-04-10 15:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-03-25 19:08 ` Mark Kettenis
2013-03-25 19:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-04-06 21:49 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-07 3:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-23 23:38 ` Joel Sherrill
2013-03-24 0:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-03-20 18:23 ` Ralf Corsepius
2013-04-01 19:56 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-03-29 12:53 Joel Sherrill
2013-03-29 14:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130325162524.GK5447@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf.corsepius@rtems.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox