From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/9] TUI: Use internally fullname
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130122071205.GA31510@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83mww1ogfl.fsf@gnu.org>
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:55:10 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:11:21 +0100
> > From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >
> > - if (compare_filenames_for_search (s->filename, name))
> > + if (compare_filenames_for_search (s->filename, name)
> > + || compare_filenames_for_search (symtab_to_fullname (s), name))
> >
> > One cannot use just:
> > + if (compare_filenames_for_search (symtab_to_fullname (s), name))
> >
> > as in the case of S->FILENAME == NAME == "./gdb.base/return.c" it would be
> > a regression because SYMTAB_TO_FULLNAME == "/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/return.c".
> > Formerly S->FILENAME matched NAME but SYMTAB_TO_FULLNAME does not match NAME.
> >
> > One could also do some "normalization" of NAME, one could strip "./" but for
> > more complicated cases one cannot do much.
>
> Why strip it? We could resolve "." to an absolute file name using the
> compilation directory, and then they will match, right?
That can be done for S->FILENAME and that is already done by
symtab_to_fullname.
But for NAME - the string which user entered in "break ./gdb.base/return.c:main"
- has no compilation nor "current" directory.
I think the only perfect solution - which works also for symbolic links and ..
references such as in the case:
cd gdb
ln -s testsuite symlinked
then:
break symlinked/gdb.base/return.c
would be to try resolving the name from each directory of each file being
evaluated for a match:
/./gdb.base/return.c
/gdb/./gdb.base/return.c
/gdb/testsuite/./gdb.base/return.c
But that would be too slow and I do not think anyone would ever use it.
So far I hope this double-match of both s->filename and symtab_to_fullname (s)
is good enough for any real world case.
> > The next step would be to turn various pathname comparisons rather to
> > st_dev&&st_ino comparisons when possible which should be both faster and more
> > universal.
>
> That will break on Windows, unless we replace the library
> implementation of 'stat' and 'fstat', or provide a method for
> retrieving just the inode and device number (which could be
> implemented on Windows using available APIs, such as
> GetFileInformationByHandle).
I am aware of:
separate_debug_file_exists
Some operating systems, e.g. Windows, do not provide a meaningful
st_ino; they always set it to zero. (Windows does provide a
meaningful st_dev.) Do not indicate a duplicate library in that
case. While there is no guarantee that a system that provides
I expected to fall back to the current realpath strings matching in the
MS-Windows ST_INO == 0 case. But when you point at GetFileInformationByHandle
I see at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa363788%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
dwVolumeSerialNumber
nFileIndexHigh
nFileIndexLow
The identifier (low and high parts) and the volume serial number
uniquely identify a file on a single computer. To determine whether
two open handles represent the same file, combine the identifier and
the volume serial number for each file and compare them.
So I do not understand why MS-Windows stat call does not provide st_ino from
those fields. I expect it is just a MS-Windows stat implementation bug
probably workarounded in Cygwin but apparently not in MinGW?
Thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-17 21:59 Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-21 18:57 ` Tom Tromey
2013-01-21 21:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-22 6:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-22 7:12 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2013-01-22 8:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-22 8:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-22 11:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-22 12:05 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-22 13:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130122071205.GA31510@host2.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox