Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: palves@redhat.com
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Put a NT_PSTATUS note on solaris cores.
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201212111516.qBBFGR58001045@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121211151136.GQ31477@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker	on Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:11:36 +0400)

> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:11:36 +0400
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> > You're doing the right test.  The issue is that core_pid_to_str
> > calls into the gdbarch_core_pid_to_str, and that isn't expecting
> > to be passed a "process pid" instead of an "LWP pid".
> > 
> > Could you try this one when you have a chance?  This is rebased on
> > top of current mainline, so it restores the elfcore_write_pstatus
> > call that the Unixware-excise patch removed.  I made sure it builds with
> > --enable-targets=all.
> 
> Nice detective work :)
> 
>     (gdb) core core.26444
>     [New LWP 1]
>     Core was generated by `/[...]/simple_main'.
>     Program terminated with signal 5, Trace/breakpoint trap.
>     #0  simple_main () at simple_main.adb:4
>     4           simple.test_simple;
>     (gdb) info inferiors
>       Num  Description       Executable
>     * 1    process 26444     /[...]/simple_main
> 
> And with an older core file, since your patch handles it too:
> 
>     (gdb) info inferiors
>       Num  Description       Executable
>     * 1    <core>            /[...]/simple_main
> 
> I tested the patch against our testsuite again, no regression either.
> So it looks all good to go!

FWIIW, this is fine with me as well (both the Unixware removal and
fixing the Solaris core dump stuff).


  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-11 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-06 17:37 [PATCH] solib-svr4.c: Remove old SCO-related code Pedro Alves
2012-12-10 16:44 ` Pedro Alves
2012-12-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 1/2] Put a NT_PSTATUS note on solaris cores Pedro Alves
2012-12-11  3:04     ` Joel Brobecker
2012-12-11 12:22       ` Pedro Alves
2012-12-11 15:12         ` Joel Brobecker
2012-12-11 15:16           ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2012-12-11 16:45             ` Pedro Alves
2012-12-10 18:04   ` [PATCH 2/2] Remove all traces of Unixware Pedro Alves
2012-12-10 19:24     ` Tom Tromey
2012-12-11  2:57     ` Joel Brobecker
2012-12-11 11:37       ` Pedro Alves
2012-12-11 12:46         ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-12-11  4:20     ` Yao Qi
2012-12-11 10:59       ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201212111516.qBBFGR58001045@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox