Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA 3/4] Improved linker-debugger interface
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120718070227.GA30859@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3pq7uneej.fsf@redhat.com>

On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:42:12 +0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> I was considering suggesting the removal of the `gdb_assert' calls, and
> instead make it a simple check and return properly if the OBJFILE does
> not support probes.
> 
>     unsigned
>     get_probe_argument_count (struct objfile *objfile, struct probe *probe)
>     {
>       if (objfile->sf == NULL || objfile->sf->sym_probe_fns == NULL)
>         return 0;
> 
>       return objfile->sf->sym_probe_fns->sym_get_probe_argument_count (objfile,
>                                                                        probe);
>     }
> 
> It would cover the case when OBJFILE does not support probe and would
> not be less safe.

In fact why 'struct probe' does not contain its 'struct objfile *'?  It does
not make sense to pass probe with different objfile.  So the parameter
'objfile' should not be passed at all.


Thanks,
Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-18  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-12 12:34 [RFA 0/4] " Gary Benson
2012-07-12 12:35 ` [RFA 1/4] " Gary Benson
2012-07-12 12:36 ` [RFA 2/4] " Gary Benson
2012-07-13  9:41   ` Gary Benson
2012-07-12 12:36 ` [RFA 4/4] " Gary Benson
2012-07-13  9:42   ` Gary Benson
2012-07-13 12:20     ` Gary Benson
2012-07-17 18:11     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-07-18 14:28       ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-18 15:11         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-07-19 14:38       ` Gary Benson
2012-07-12 12:36 ` [RFA 3/4] " Gary Benson
2012-07-17 18:01   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-07-17 21:57   ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-17 23:42     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-07-18  7:02       ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2012-07-18 10:36         ` Gary Benson
2012-07-19 14:36     ` Gary Benson
2012-07-18 14:08 ` [RFA 0/4] " Gary Benson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120718070227.GA30859@host2.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox