From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA 3/4] Improved linker-debugger interface
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3pq7uneej.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120717215641.GA10049@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:56:41 +0200")
On Tuesday, July 17 2012, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:35:54 +0200, Gary Benson wrote:
>> --- a/gdb/probe.h
>> +++ b/gdb/probe.h
>> @@ -210,6 +210,17 @@ extern void info_probes_for_ops (char *arg, int from_tty,
>>
>> extern struct cmd_list_element **info_probes_cmdlist_get (void);
>>
>> +/* Return the argument count of the specified probe. */
>
> /* OBJFILE must be known to have probes support. */
I was considering suggesting the removal of the `gdb_assert' calls, and
instead make it a simple check and return properly if the OBJFILE does
not support probes.
unsigned
get_probe_argument_count (struct objfile *objfile, struct probe *probe)
{
if (objfile->sf == NULL || objfile->sf->sym_probe_fns == NULL)
return 0;
return objfile->sf->sym_probe_fns->sym_get_probe_argument_count (objfile,
probe);
}
It would cover the case when OBJFILE does not support probe and would
not be less safe.
--
Sergio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-17 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-12 12:34 [RFA 0/4] " Gary Benson
2012-07-12 12:35 ` [RFA 1/4] " Gary Benson
2012-07-12 12:36 ` [RFA 4/4] " Gary Benson
2012-07-13 9:42 ` Gary Benson
2012-07-13 12:20 ` Gary Benson
2012-07-17 18:11 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-07-18 14:28 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-18 15:11 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-07-19 14:38 ` Gary Benson
2012-07-12 12:36 ` [RFA 2/4] " Gary Benson
2012-07-13 9:41 ` Gary Benson
2012-07-12 12:36 ` [RFA 3/4] " Gary Benson
2012-07-17 18:01 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-07-17 21:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-17 23:42 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2012-07-18 7:02 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-18 10:36 ` Gary Benson
2012-07-19 14:36 ` Gary Benson
2012-07-18 14:08 ` [RFA 0/4] " Gary Benson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3pq7uneej.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox