From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ping: Re: [patch] Forbid "run" etc. for use_gdb_stub targets
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 01:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111204012935.GA4034@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22Qt0qnaymAoWGWU48boOKPaYfzCWMEyn5BDkGYNcdfKkg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 02:02:06 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
> I'd like to get away from conflating anything related to gdb stubs and
> valgrind / gdbserver.
Currently $use_gdb_stub means the startup has been already executed when the
testsuite gets into GDB control.
IIUC in reality currently the real stubs are not in use but gdbserver in
non-extended mode behaves as native GDB with the stubs in the past.
Maybe $use_gdb_stub name is not fortunate for what it does, real stubs are
only subset of $use_gdb_stub cases.
wrt valgrind, you may be referring to:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-10/msg00768.html
# Therefore shouldn't be the gdb.server/ext-*.exp testfiles skipped if the
# target board defined use_gdb_stub? (ext-attach.exp already is skipped, for
# the [is_remote target] reason)
[unreplied]
Currently I did not change on the GDB testsuite behavior what was not clearly
wrong. Therefore:
* If a testcase can run only in some its specific mode/board of run:
* Some testcases skip themselves if their mode/board is not satisfied.
--- if [is_remote target] then { return 0 }
* Some testcases enforce their mode/board no matter what mode has been
specified by user for the testsuite.
--- gdbserver_start_extended
This creates duplicate runs of a testcase in the same mode/board if one
runs the testsuite in multiple modes.
* If a testcase is compatible with any mode/board it uses the mode/board
specified by user for the testsuite.
So far I just fixed those cases there were clearly wrong - such as spawning a
gdbserver and then running new inferior locally in GDB.
In the case of gdb.base/valgrind-db-attach.exp it enforces its mode and always
runs.
Thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-04 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-21 9:19 [PATCH] PR/12691 Add the inferior to Python exited event Kevin Pouget
2011-04-21 10:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-25 18:19 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-26 8:24 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-08-31 14:34 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-08-31 14:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-08-31 14:58 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-08-31 17:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-08-31 17:53 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-31 17:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-01 9:18 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-01 8:45 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-01 10:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-01 11:29 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-15 12:49 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-15 13:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-15 14:19 ` Paul_Koning
2011-09-15 15:27 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-15 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-08-31 15:50 ` Tom Tromey
2011-09-19 10:37 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-19 10:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-03 16:38 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-04 8:05 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-05 12:15 ` Regression (or a new FAIL?): gdb.python/py-events.exp [Re: [PATCH] PR/12691 Add the inferior to Python exited event] Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-05 12:37 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-05 14:16 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-05 14:56 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-09 18:17 ` [patch] gdb.python/py-events.exp: Disable multi-inferior for gdbserver [Re: Regression (or a new FAIL?): gdb.python/py-events.exp] Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-26 15:07 ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-27 10:31 ` [patch] Forbid "run" etc. for use_gdb_stub targets [Re: [patch] gdb.python/py-events.exp: Disable multi-inferior for gdbserver] Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-27 18:26 ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-28 17:40 ` [commit test fixes] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-28 17:42 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-28 18:32 ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-29 19:55 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-03 18:37 ` ping: Re: [patch] Forbid "run" etc. for use_gdb_stub targets Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-03 19:15 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-03 20:22 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-04 1:02 ` ping: " Doug Evans
2011-12-04 1:30 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2011-12-04 2:55 ` Doug Evans
2011-12-05 20:25 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-05 21:44 ` Doug Evans
2011-12-05 23:36 ` Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111204012935.GA4034@host2.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevin.pouget@gmail.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox