From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Forbid "run" etc. for use_gdb_stub targets [Re: [patch] gdb.python/py-events.exp: Disable multi-inferior for gdbserver]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110281917.44839.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111028174014.GB18885@host1.jankratochvil.net>
On Friday 28 October 2011 18:40:14, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:09:36 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > Not sure what you mean. Is is that use_gdb_stub will be wrong?
> > Maybe we can override it?
>
> Done overriding both ways, to have use_gdb_stub always right.
>
> Do you agree with it this way?
Yes, but see below.
> It was a leftover, thanks; anyway dropped this conditional now when
> use_gdb_stub should be always correct now.
Ah, much better.
> +
> # TCL/EXPECT WART ALERT
> # Expect does something very strange when it receives a single braced
> # argument. It splits it along word separators and performs substitutions.
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdbserver-support.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdbserver-support.exp
> @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ proc gdbserver_start { options arguments } {
> if [target_info exists gdb_protocol] {
> set protocol [target_info gdb_protocol]
> } else {
> + set_currtarget_info use_gdb_stub 1
> set protocol "remote"
> }
Isn't this too late though? We do the [target_info exists use_gdb_stub]
check at the top of the test files, before gdbserver_start has had a chance
of running. So I'm guessing that in the first test that runs right
after the gdb.server/ tests complete, use_gdb_stub will be wrong at the top of
the test, but it'll get fixed by that test, so the following ones are right.
If that test file happen to have a use_gdb_stub check, it'll lose.
We may need to do this closer to gdb_init/default_gdb_init (or an override).
>
> @@ -337,9 +338,13 @@ proc gdbserver_reconnect { } {
>
> # Start and connect to a gdbserver in extended mode.
> proc gdbserver_start_extended { } {
> + global gdbserver_protocol
> + global gdbserver_gdbport
> +
> set res [gdbserver_start "--multi" ""]
> set gdbserver_protocol "extended-[lindex $res 0]"
> set gdbserver_gdbport [lindex $res 1]
> + unset_currtarget_info use_gdb_stub
>
> return [gdb_target_cmd $gdbserver_protocol $gdbserver_gdbport]
> }
>
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-28 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-21 9:19 [PATCH] PR/12691 Add the inferior to Python exited event Kevin Pouget
2011-04-21 10:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-25 18:19 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-26 8:24 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-08-31 14:34 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-08-31 14:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-08-31 14:58 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-08-31 17:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-08-31 17:53 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-31 17:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-01 9:18 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-01 8:45 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-01 10:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-01 11:29 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-15 12:49 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-15 13:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-15 14:19 ` Paul_Koning
2011-09-15 15:27 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-15 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-08-31 15:50 ` Tom Tromey
2011-09-19 10:37 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-09-19 10:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-03 16:38 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-04 8:05 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-05 12:15 ` Regression (or a new FAIL?): gdb.python/py-events.exp [Re: [PATCH] PR/12691 Add the inferior to Python exited event] Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-05 12:37 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-05 14:16 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-05 14:56 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-09 18:17 ` [patch] gdb.python/py-events.exp: Disable multi-inferior for gdbserver [Re: Regression (or a new FAIL?): gdb.python/py-events.exp] Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-26 15:07 ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-27 10:31 ` [patch] Forbid "run" etc. for use_gdb_stub targets [Re: [patch] gdb.python/py-events.exp: Disable multi-inferior for gdbserver] Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-27 18:26 ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-28 17:40 ` [commit test fixes] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-28 17:42 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-28 18:32 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-10-29 19:55 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-03 18:37 ` ping: Re: [patch] Forbid "run" etc. for use_gdb_stub targets Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-03 19:15 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-03 20:22 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-04 1:02 ` ping: " Doug Evans
2011-12-04 1:30 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-04 2:55 ` Doug Evans
2011-12-05 20:25 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-05 21:44 ` Doug Evans
2011-12-05 23:36 ` Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201110281917.44839.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=kevin.pouget@gmail.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox