Re: New ARI warning Sat Mar 12 01:53:29 UTC 2011

[Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>]

On Monday 14 March 2011 13:06:08, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I'm fine with your suggestion, and in fact it's my preference
> > as well.  However, there are cases where you just can't do that,
> > because the return type + function name + parameter end up being
> > too long for a single line.
> 
> What's wrong with leaving a single long line in such cases?  They are
> supposed to be very rare (if typedefs are used for complex function
> arguments).

If we have a rule to follow, we should follow it everywhere.
And they are not very rare; we have quite a few cases.  The most
prominent styles are:

/* Find a particular location expression from a location list.  */
const gdb_byte *dwarf2_find_location_expression
  (struct dwarf2_loclist_baton *baton,
   size_t *locexpr_length,
   CORE_ADDR pc);

/* Find an inferior bound to PSPACE.  */
extern struct inferior *
  find_inferior_for_program_space (struct program_space *pspace);

-- 
Pedro Alves