Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: ktietz70@googlemail.com, binutils@sourceware.org,
	       gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch libiberty include]: Add additional helper functions for directory-separator searching
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201103081941.p28Jf0Uq027041@greed.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83aah5h34g.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 08	Mar 2011 20:35:27 +0200)


> I think we don't need filename_dirchr, only filename_dirrchr.

I see no harm in having both, for completeness, though.  One could
argue they should be in separate files, but they're trivial functions
on non-dos-fs systems.

What bothers me about this patch is that we're adding yet another set
of functions that don't discriminate between the host filesystem, the
target filesystem, and the build filesystem.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-08 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-08 11:25 Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 11:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 11:55   ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 12:01     ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 12:48       ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 13:25         ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 13:33           ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 14:30             ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 14:45               ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 18:49               ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 18:54                 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 18:58                 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 19:59                   ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found] ` <E1Pwupb-0001ns-M8__47566.5626036518$1299582745$gmane$org@fencepost.gnu.org>
2011-03-08 12:43   ` Andreas Schwab
2011-03-08 16:52 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 17:02   ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 18:39     ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 19:51       ` DJ Delorie [this message]
2011-03-08 22:38         ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 23:10         ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09  7:12           ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-09 12:40             ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09 12:54               ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-09 13:39                 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09 13:54                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-12 22:59                     ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-09 15:02                   ` Build regression [Re: [patch libiberty include]: Add additional helper functions for directory-separator searching] Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-09 15:40                     ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09 16:09                       ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-13  1:09         ` [patch libiberty include]: Add additional helper functions for directory-separator searching Kai Tietz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201103081941.p28Jf0Uq027041@greed.delorie.com \
    --to=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ktietz70@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox