From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch libiberty include]: Add additional helper functions for directory-separator searching
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Pwupb-0001ns-M8@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimyJb-3jEaWbbmUj2ZAOYPzhGT_GX9QFwR4DBCh@mail.gmail.com> (message from Kai Tietz on Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:56:45 +0100)
> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:56:45 +0100
> From: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
>
> +@deftypefn Extension int filename_dirchr (const char *@var{p})
> +
> +The returned value is similar to what @code{strchr} would return for
> +searching for a directory separator.
> +
> +This function does not normalize file name. However, it does handle
> +the fact that on DOS-like file systems, forward and backward slashes
> +are directory separators.
This is very mysterious. The documentation should explain how this is
"handled", or else the user will have no choice but to look in the
sources. And description "by similarity" doesn't help, because this
function is obviously different from strchr in _some_ ways, but you
don't say how.
While at that, explain the problem this solves, or else the raison
d'etre of this function will not be understood. We do want this
function to be used instead of just strchr, don't we? For it to be
used, its purpose and advantages should be well understood.
Btw, why do we need filename_dirchr? The use case for
filename_dirrchr is clear, but in what situations will we need the
other one?
> + if (!r || (r2 && r2 < r))
Why do you test for r2 being non-NULL? You are not going to
dereference it in the next comparison, and NULL is comparable as any
other value.
> +@deftypefn Extension int filename_dirrchr (const char *@var{p})
> +
> +The returned value is similar to what @code{strrchr} would return for
> +searching for a directory separator.
> +
> +This function does not normalize file name. However, it does handle
> +the fact that on DOS-like file systems, forward and backward slashes
> +are directory separators.
Same comments about this doc.
> + if (!r || (r2 && r2 > r))
And same comment here about testing r2 for non-NULL value.
Please also wait for others to review, as I'm not authorized to
approve the changes.
Thanks for working on this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-08 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-08 11:25 Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 11:53 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2011-03-08 11:55 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 12:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 12:48 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 13:25 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 13:33 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 14:30 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 14:45 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 18:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 18:54 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 18:58 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 19:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <E1Pwupb-0001ns-M8__47566.5626036518$1299582745$gmane$org@fencepost.gnu.org>
2011-03-08 12:43 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-03-08 16:52 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 17:02 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 18:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 19:51 ` DJ Delorie
2011-03-08 22:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 23:10 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09 7:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-09 12:40 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09 12:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-09 13:39 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09 13:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-12 22:59 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-09 15:02 ` Build regression [Re: [patch libiberty include]: Add additional helper functions for directory-separator searching] Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-09 15:40 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09 16:09 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-13 1:09 ` [patch libiberty include]: Add additional helper functions for directory-separator searching Kai Tietz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1Pwupb-0001ns-M8@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=ktietz70@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox