* [RFA] remote.c, clean-up mix-up
@ 2010-05-05 22:37 Michael Snyder
2010-05-05 23:08 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2010-05-05 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches, Pedro Alves
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 325 bytes --]
I'm not sure if this clean-up ever happens, because the declaration
merely shadows an outer declaration of the same name, and the
do_cleanups call happens outside the scope of this declaration.
This is my **GUESS** as to what might be intended here.
If anybody has an alternate hypothesis, it's probably
better than mine.
[-- Attachment #2: remote2.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 868 bytes --]
2010-05-05 Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
* remote.c (remote_threads_info): Remove shadowing declaration.
Index: remote.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/remote.c,v
retrieving revision 1.407
diff -u -p -5 -r1.407 remote.c
--- remote.c 5 May 2010 22:27:15 -0000 1.407
+++ remote.c 5 May 2010 22:31:28 -0000
@@ -2510,12 +2510,12 @@ remote_threads_info (struct target_ops *
struct cleanup *back_to = make_cleanup (xfree, xml);
if (xml && *xml)
{
struct gdb_xml_parser *parser;
struct threads_parsing_context context;
- struct cleanup back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
+ back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
context.items = 0;
parser = gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup (_("threads"),
threads_elements,
&context);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] remote.c, clean-up mix-up
2010-05-05 22:37 [RFA] remote.c, clean-up mix-up Michael Snyder
@ 2010-05-05 23:08 ` Pedro Alves
2010-05-05 23:44 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2010-05-05 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Snyder; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Wednesday 05 May 2010 23:36:54, Michael Snyder wrote:
> I'm not sure if this clean-up ever happens, because the declaration
> merely shadows an outer declaration of the same name, and the
> do_cleanups call happens outside the scope of this declaration.
It runs when the outer do_cleanups runs. But that's not
the point.
>
> This is my **GUESS** as to what might be intended here.
> If anybody has an alternate hypothesis, it's probably
> better than mine.
A null_cleanup's intention is _always_ to start a new
cleanup scope. If the variable is unused, it either
means the new cleanup scope wasn't neecessary in the
first place, or, there's a do_cleanups call missing
for this inner cleanups scope.
As I said in the other email, there appears to be
a bug here that may hint at what was meant. See the
other uses of gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup in
the tree:
osdata.c:
back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
parser = gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup (_("osdata"),
osdata_elements, &data);
gdb_xml_use_dtd (parser, "osdata.dtd");
before_deleting_result = make_cleanup (clear_parsing_data, &data);
if (gdb_xml_parse (parser, xml) == 0)
/* Parsed successfully, don't need to delete the result. */
discard_cleanups (before_deleting_result);
do_cleanups (back_to);
solib-target.c:
back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
parser = gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup (_("target library list"),
library_list_elements, &result);
gdb_xml_use_dtd (parser, "library-list.dtd");
before_deleting_result = make_cleanup (solib_target_free_library_list,
&result);
if (gdb_xml_parse (parser, library) == 0)
/* Parsed successfully, don't need to delete the result. */
discard_cleanups (before_deleting_result);
do_cleanups (back_to);
memory-map.c:
back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
parser = gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup (_("target memory map"),
memory_map_elements, &data);
/* Note: 'clear_result' will zero 'result'. */
before_deleting_result = make_cleanup (clear_result, &result);
data.memory_map = &result;
if (gdb_xml_parse (parser, memory_map) == 0)
/* Parsed successfully, don't need to delete the result. */
discard_cleanups (before_deleting_result);
do_cleanups (back_to);
Note how all of them install a cleanup for deleting
the result of the parsing, in case parsing fails midway,
when pieces of the result had already been allocated.
>
> remote2.txt
> 2010-05-05 Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
>
> * remote.c (remote_threads_info): Remove shadowing declaration.
>
> Index: remote.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/remote.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.407
> diff -u -p -5 -r1.407 remote.c
> --- remote.c 5 May 2010 22:27:15 -0000 1.407
> +++ remote.c 5 May 2010 22:31:28 -0000
> @@ -2510,12 +2510,12 @@ remote_threads_info (struct target_ops *
> struct cleanup *back_to = make_cleanup (xfree, xml);
> if (xml && *xml)
> {
> struct gdb_xml_parser *parser;
> struct threads_parsing_context context;
> - struct cleanup back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
>
> + back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
> context.items = 0;
> parser = gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup (_("threads"),
> threads_elements,
> &context);
>
--
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] remote.c, clean-up mix-up
2010-05-05 23:08 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2010-05-05 23:44 ` Pedro Alves
2010-05-06 0:18 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2010-05-05 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Michael Snyder
On Thursday 06 May 2010 00:08:20, Pedro Alves wrote:
> A null_cleanup's intention is always to start a new
> cleanup scope. If the variable is unused, it either
> means the new cleanup scope wasn't neecessary in the
> first place, or, there's a do_cleanups call missing
> for this inner cleanups scope.
>
> As I said in the other email, there appears to be
> a bug here that may hint at what was meant. See the
> other uses of gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup in
> the tree:
...
>
> Note how all of them install a cleanup for deleting
> the result of the parsing, in case parsing fails midway,
> when pieces of the result had already been allocated.
Here's what I'm testing.
--
Pedro Alves
2010-05-05 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
* remote.c (clear_threads_parsing_context): New.
(remote_threads_info): Delele unused null_cleanup. Install a
cleanup to clear the threads_parsing_context in case parsing
throws.
---
gdb/remote.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: src/gdb/remote.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/remote.c 2010-05-06 00:35:10.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/remote.c 2010-05-06 00:41:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -2482,6 +2482,21 @@ const struct gdb_xml_element threads_ele
{ NULL, NULL, NULL, GDB_XML_EF_NONE, NULL, NULL }
};
+/* Discard the contents of the constructed thread info context. */
+
+static void
+clear_threads_parsing_context (void *p)
+{
+ struct threads_parsing_context *context = p;
+ int i;
+ struct thread_item *item;
+
+ for (i = 0; VEC_iterate (thread_item_t, context->items, i, item); ++i)
+ xfree (item->extra);
+
+ VEC_free (thread_item_t, context->items);
+}
+
#endif
/*
@@ -2512,7 +2527,7 @@ remote_threads_info (struct target_ops *
{
struct gdb_xml_parser *parser;
struct threads_parsing_context context;
- struct cleanup *back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
+ struct cleanup *clear_parsing_context;
context.items = 0;
parser = gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup (_("threads"),
@@ -2521,6 +2536,9 @@ remote_threads_info (struct target_ops *
gdb_xml_use_dtd (parser, "threads.dtd");
+ clear_parsing_context
+ = make_cleanup (clear_threads_parsing_context, &context);
+
if (gdb_xml_parse (parser, xml) == 0)
{
int i;
@@ -2542,13 +2560,12 @@ remote_threads_info (struct target_ops *
info = demand_private_info (item->ptid);
info->core = item->core;
info->extra = item->extra;
- item->extra = 0;
+ item->extra = NULL;
}
- xfree (item->extra);
}
}
- VEC_free (thread_item_t, context.items);
+ do_cleanups (clear_parsing_context);
}
do_cleanups (back_to);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] remote.c, clean-up mix-up
2010-05-05 23:44 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2010-05-06 0:18 ` Pedro Alves
2010-05-06 0:28 ` Michael Snyder
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2010-05-06 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Michael Snyder
On Thursday 06 May 2010 00:44:35, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Here's what I'm testing.
No regressions against x86_64-linux gdbserver.
> 2010-05-05 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
>
> * remote.c (clear_threads_parsing_context): New.
> (remote_threads_info): Delele unused null_cleanup. Install a
> cleanup to clear the threads_parsing_context in case parsing
> throws.
Applied as below with a little comment added and typo in
changelog fixed.
--
Pedro Alves
2010-05-06 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
* remote.c (clear_threads_parsing_context): New.
(remote_threads_info): Delete unused null_cleanup. Install a
cleanup to clear the threads_parsing_context in case parsing
throws.
---
gdb/remote.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: src/gdb/remote.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/remote.c 2010-05-06 01:01:56.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/remote.c 2010-05-06 01:10:47.000000000 +0100
@@ -2482,6 +2482,21 @@ const struct gdb_xml_element threads_ele
{ NULL, NULL, NULL, GDB_XML_EF_NONE, NULL, NULL }
};
+/* Discard the contents of the constructed thread info context. */
+
+static void
+clear_threads_parsing_context (void *p)
+{
+ struct threads_parsing_context *context = p;
+ int i;
+ struct thread_item *item;
+
+ for (i = 0; VEC_iterate (thread_item_t, context->items, i, item); ++i)
+ xfree (item->extra);
+
+ VEC_free (thread_item_t, context->items);
+}
+
#endif
/*
@@ -2512,15 +2527,20 @@ remote_threads_info (struct target_ops *
{
struct gdb_xml_parser *parser;
struct threads_parsing_context context;
- struct cleanup *back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
+ struct cleanup *clear_parsing_context;
context.items = 0;
+ /* Note: this parser cleanup is already guarded by BACK_TO
+ above. */
parser = gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup (_("threads"),
threads_elements,
&context);
gdb_xml_use_dtd (parser, "threads.dtd");
+ clear_parsing_context
+ = make_cleanup (clear_threads_parsing_context, &context);
+
if (gdb_xml_parse (parser, xml) == 0)
{
int i;
@@ -2542,13 +2562,12 @@ remote_threads_info (struct target_ops *
info = demand_private_info (item->ptid);
info->core = item->core;
info->extra = item->extra;
- item->extra = 0;
+ item->extra = NULL;
}
- xfree (item->extra);
}
}
- VEC_free (thread_item_t, context.items);
+ do_cleanups (clear_parsing_context);
}
do_cleanups (back_to);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] remote.c, clean-up mix-up
2010-05-06 0:18 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2010-05-06 0:28 ` Michael Snyder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2010-05-06 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: gdb-patches
Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Thursday 06 May 2010 00:44:35, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Here's what I'm testing.
>
> No regressions against x86_64-linux gdbserver.
>
>> 2010-05-05 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
>>
>> * remote.c (clear_threads_parsing_context): New.
>> (remote_threads_info): Delele unused null_cleanup. Install a
>> cleanup to clear the threads_parsing_context in case parsing
>> throws.
>
> Applied as below with a little comment added and typo in
> changelog fixed.
>
Thanks a lot for following through!
Michael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-06 0:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-05 22:37 [RFA] remote.c, clean-up mix-up Michael Snyder
2010-05-05 23:08 ` Pedro Alves
2010-05-05 23:44 ` Pedro Alves
2010-05-06 0:18 ` Pedro Alves
2010-05-06 0:28 ` Michael Snyder
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox