Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] remote.c, clean-up mix-up
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 23:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005060008.20450.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE1F306.8060006@vmware.com>

On Wednesday 05 May 2010 23:36:54, Michael Snyder wrote:
> I'm not sure if this clean-up ever happens, because the declaration
> merely shadows an outer declaration of the same name, and the 
> do_cleanups call happens outside the scope of this declaration.

It runs when the outer do_cleanups runs.  But that's not
the point.

> 
> This is my **GUESS** as to what might be intended here.
> If anybody has an alternate hypothesis, it's probably
> better than mine.

A null_cleanup's intention is _always_ to start a new
cleanup scope.  If the variable is unused, it either
means the new cleanup scope wasn't neecessary in the
first place, or, there's a do_cleanups call missing
for this inner cleanups scope.

As I said in the other email, there appears to be
a bug here that may hint at what was meant.  See the
other uses of gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup in
the tree:

osdata.c:

  back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
  parser = gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup (_("osdata"),
                                             osdata_elements, &data);
  gdb_xml_use_dtd (parser, "osdata.dtd");

  before_deleting_result = make_cleanup (clear_parsing_data, &data);

  if (gdb_xml_parse (parser, xml) == 0)
    /* Parsed successfully, don't need to delete the result.  */
    discard_cleanups (before_deleting_result);

  do_cleanups (back_to);

solib-target.c:

  back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
  parser = gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup (_("target library list"),
                                              library_list_elements, &result);
  gdb_xml_use_dtd (parser, "library-list.dtd");

  before_deleting_result = make_cleanup (solib_target_free_library_list,
                                         &result);

  if (gdb_xml_parse (parser, library) == 0)
    /* Parsed successfully, don't need to delete the result.  */
    discard_cleanups (before_deleting_result);

  do_cleanups (back_to);

memory-map.c:

  back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
  parser = gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup (_("target memory map"),
                                              memory_map_elements, &data);

  /* Note: 'clear_result' will zero 'result'.  */
  before_deleting_result = make_cleanup (clear_result, &result);
  data.memory_map = &result;

  if (gdb_xml_parse (parser, memory_map) == 0)
    /* Parsed successfully, don't need to delete the result.  */
    discard_cleanups (before_deleting_result);

  do_cleanups (back_to);


Note how all of them install a cleanup for deleting
the result of the parsing, in case parsing fails midway,
when pieces of the result had already been allocated.



> 
> remote2.txt
>   2010-05-05  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@vmware.com>
> 
>         * remote.c (remote_threads_info): Remove shadowing declaration.
> 
> Index: remote.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/remote.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.407
> diff -u -p -5 -r1.407 remote.c
> --- remote.c    5 May 2010 22:27:15 -0000       1.407
> +++ remote.c    5 May 2010 22:31:28 -0000
> @@ -2510,12 +2510,12 @@ remote_threads_info (struct target_ops *
>        struct cleanup *back_to = make_cleanup (xfree, xml);
>        if (xml && *xml)
>         {
>           struct gdb_xml_parser *parser;
>           struct threads_parsing_context context;
> -         struct cleanup back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
>  
> +         back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
>           context.items = 0;
>           parser = gdb_xml_create_parser_and_cleanup (_("threads"),
>                                                       threads_elements,
>                                                       &context);
>  


-- 
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-05 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-05 22:37 Michael Snyder
2010-05-05 23:08 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2010-05-05 23:44   ` Pedro Alves
2010-05-06  0:18     ` Pedro Alves
2010-05-06  0:28       ` Michael Snyder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201005060008.20450.pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox