* PATCH: Document i386 target features
@ 2010-02-08 15:33 H.J. Lu
2010-02-08 18:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2010-02-08 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GDB
Hi,
Here is the patch to document i386 target features for i386 XML files
I checked in. OK to install?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2010-02-08 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* gdb.texinfo: Document i386 target features.
diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
index f01a720..c53f01a 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
@@ -32796,6 +32796,7 @@ registers using the capitalization used in the description.
@menu
* ARM Features::
+* I386 Features::
* MIPS Features::
* M68K Features::
* PowerPC Features::
@@ -32831,6 +32832,26 @@ quad-precision registers from pairs of double-precision registers.
If this feature is present, @samp{org.gnu.gdb.arm.vfp} must also
be present and include 32 double-precision registers.
+@node I386 Features
+@subsection I386 Features
+@cindex target descriptions, I386 features
+
+The @samp{org.gnu.gdb.i386.core} feature is required for i386/amd64
+targets. It should contain registers @samp{eax} through @samp{edi}
+plus @samp{eip} for i386 and @samp{rax} through @samp{r15} plus
+@samp{rip} for amd64, @samp{eflags}, @samp{cs}, @samp{ss}, @samp{ds},
+@samp{es}, @samp{fs}, @samp{gs}, registers @samp{st0} through @samp{st7},
+@samp{fctrl}, @samp{fstat}, @samp{ftag}, @samp{fiseg}, @samp{fioff},
+@samp{foseg}, @samp{fooff} and @samp{fop}.
+They may be i386 or amd64 depending on the target.
+
+The @samp{org.gnu.gdb.i386.sse} feature is required. It should
+contain registers @samp{xmm0} through @samp{xmm7} for i386,
+registers @samp{xmm0} through @samp{xmm15} for amd64 and @samp{mxcsr}.
+
+The @samp{org.gnu.gdb.i386.linux} feature is optional. It should
+contain a single register, @samp{orig_eax}.
+
@node MIPS Features
@subsection MIPS Features
@cindex target descriptions, MIPS features
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: PATCH: Document i386 target features
2010-02-08 15:33 PATCH: Document i386 target features H.J. Lu
@ 2010-02-08 18:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-02-08 19:13 ` H.J. Lu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2010-02-08 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:33:37 -0800
> From: "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>
> Here is the patch to document i386 target features for i386 XML files
> I checked in. OK to install?
Thanks, I have a few comments:
> +@cindex target descriptions, I386 features
Index entries are supposed to be mostly in lower case. Would it be
okay to use "i386" instead of I386 here?
> +targets. It should contain registers @samp{eax} through @samp{edi}
> +plus @samp{eip} for i386 and @samp{rax} through @samp{r15} plus
> +@samp{rip} for amd64, @samp{eflags}, @samp{cs}, @samp{ss}, @samp{ds},
> +@samp{es}, @samp{fs}, @samp{gs}, registers @samp{st0} through @samp{st7},
> +@samp{fctrl}, @samp{fstat}, @samp{ftag}, @samp{fiseg}, @samp{fioff},
> +@samp{foseg}, @samp{fooff} and @samp{fop}.
This list is very long, and makes the sentence long and hard to
grasp. I think it would be more palatable as an itemized list, like
so:
It should contain the following registers:
@itemize @minus
@item
@samp{eax} through @samp{edi} and @samp{eip} for i386
@item
@samp{rax} through @samp{r15} plus @samp{rip} for amd64
@item
@samp{eflags}
@item
@samp{cs}, @samp{ss}, @samp{ds}, @samp{es}, @samp{fs}, @samp{gs}
...
@end itemize
(I grouped related registers together to make the list shorter).
Btw, is it "contain the following registers" or "describe the
following registers"?
> +They may be i386 or amd64 depending on the target.
Who are "they" here?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: PATCH: Document i386 target features
2010-02-08 18:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2010-02-08 19:13 ` H.J. Lu
2010-02-08 19:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2010-02-08 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:33:37 -0800
>> From: "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>>
>> Here is the patch to document i386 target features for i386 XML files
>> I checked in. OK to install?
>
> Thanks, I have a few comments:
>
>> +@cindex target descriptions, I386 features
>
> Index entries are supposed to be mostly in lower case. Would it be
> okay to use "i386" instead of I386 here?
>
>> +targets. It should contain registers @samp{eax} through @samp{edi}
>> +plus @samp{eip} for i386 and @samp{rax} through @samp{r15} plus
>> +@samp{rip} for amd64, @samp{eflags}, @samp{cs}, @samp{ss}, @samp{ds},
>> +@samp{es}, @samp{fs}, @samp{gs}, registers @samp{st0} through @samp{st7},
>> +@samp{fctrl}, @samp{fstat}, @samp{ftag}, @samp{fiseg}, @samp{fioff},
>> +@samp{foseg}, @samp{fooff} and @samp{fop}.
>
> This list is very long, and makes the sentence long and hard to
> grasp. I think it would be more palatable as an itemized list, like
> so:
>
> It should contain the following registers:
>
> @itemize @minus
> @item
> @samp{eax} through @samp{edi} and @samp{eip} for i386
> @item
> @samp{rax} through @samp{r15} plus @samp{rip} for amd64
> @item
> @samp{eflags}
> @item
> @samp{cs}, @samp{ss}, @samp{ds}, @samp{es}, @samp{fs}, @samp{gs}
> ...
> @end itemize
>
> (I grouped related registers together to make the list shorter).
>
> Btw, is it "contain the following registers" or "describe the
> following registers"?
>
>> +They may be i386 or amd64 depending on the target.
>
> Who are "they" here?
>
Thanks for your comments. This patch generates:
.4.2 i386 Features
-------------------
The `org.gnu.gdb.i386.core' feature is required for i386/amd64 targets.
It should describe the following registers:
`eax' through `edi' plus `eip' for i386
- `rax' through `r15' plus `rip' for amd64
- `eflags', `cs', `ss', `ds', `es', `fs', `gs'
- `st0' through `st7'
- `fctrl', `fstat', `ftag', `fiseg', `fioff', `foseg', `fooff' and
`fop'
The register sets may be different, depending on the target.
...
Will it be OK to install?
Thanks.
--
H.J.
--
diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
index f01a720..0b17685 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
@@ -32796,6 +32796,7 @@ registers using the capitalization used in the
description.
@menu
* ARM Features::
+* i386 Features::
* MIPS Features::
* M68K Features::
* PowerPC Features::
@@ -32831,6 +32832,43 @@ quad-precision registers from pairs of
double-precision registers.
If this feature is present, @samp{org.gnu.gdb.arm.vfp} must also
be present and include 32 double-precision registers.
+@node i386 Features
+@subsection i386 Features
+@cindex target descriptions, i386 features
+
+The @samp{org.gnu.gdb.i386.core} feature is required for i386/amd64
+targets. It should describe the following registers:
+
+@itemize @minus
+@samp{eax} through @samp{edi} plus @samp{eip} for i386
+@item
+@samp{rax} through @samp{r15} plus @samp{rip} for amd64
+@item
+@samp{eflags}, @samp{cs}, @samp{ss}, @samp{ds}, @samp{es},
+@samp{fs}, @samp{gs}
+@item
+@samp{st0} through @samp{st7}
+@item
+@samp{fctrl}, @samp{fstat}, @samp{ftag}, @samp{fiseg}, @samp{fioff},
+@samp{foseg}, @samp{fooff} and @samp{fop}
+@end itemize
+
+The register sets may be different, depending on the target.
+
+The @samp{org.gnu.gdb.i386.sse} feature is required. It should
+describe registers:
+
+@itemize @minus
+@samp{xmm0} through @samp{xmm7} for i386
+@item
+@samp{xmm0} through @samp{xmm15} for amd64
+@item
+@samp{mxcsr}
+@end itemize
+
+The @samp{org.gnu.gdb.i386.linux} feature is optional. It should
+describe a single register, @samp{orig_eax}.
+
@node MIPS Features
@subsection MIPS Features
@cindex target descriptions, MIPS features
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: PATCH: Document i386 target features
2010-02-08 19:13 ` H.J. Lu
@ 2010-02-08 19:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2010-02-08 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:13:00 -0800
> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> Will it be OK to install?
Yes, but...
> +@itemize @minus
> +@samp{eax} through @samp{edi} plus @samp{eip} for i386
You forgot @item line after the @itemize line.
That's why the first line in the result lacks the dash:
> It should describe the following registers:
>
> `eax' through `edi' plus `eip' for i386
>
> - `rax' through `r15' plus `rip' for amd64
> +@itemize @minus
> +@samp{xmm0} through @samp{xmm7} for i386
And here as well.
Okay with these two changes.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-08 19:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-08 15:33 PATCH: Document i386 target features H.J. Lu
2010-02-08 18:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-02-08 19:13 ` H.J. Lu
2010-02-08 19:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox