Re: TR: ARI warning list change Fri May 29 01:53:26 UTC 2009

[Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>]

On Friday 29 May 2009 12:31:30 Pierre Muller wrote:
> > > Objet : ARI warning list change Fri May 29 01:53:26 UTC 2009
> > >
> > > 657a658,659
> > > > gdb/mi/mi-cmd-var.c:251: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be
> > marked
> 
> > I am missing context on this email, but at least in MI, it's not yet
> > clear
> > which messages should be i18n and which are not. Some are results of
> > frontend
> > coding bug and as such should be never presented to user and should not
> > be
> > ever translated. And if they are translated, they won't help the user
> > but
> > will make it harder to understand the error for developer.
> 
> 
>   You are probably right... I don't know much about mi...
> 
>   Should this warning disappear for mi directory altogether,
> or should we add a /* ARI: _ markup */ to silence gdb_ari.sh
> where translation is discouraged?
> 
> Pierre
> 
> PS: Could you take care of the missing "_()"
> in gdb/varobj.c source?

I don't really know what is "missing". Am I supposed to
grep for such, or there's a list of suspect places already?

> 
>     I think that these are the kind of patches that can go in
> as obvious, as all mechanical ARI fixes.

I *clearly* miss some context. What is "ARI"? What is this automated
inspection thing? Where are results of such inspection posted?

- Volodya