From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18125 invoked by alias); 29 May 2009 09:09:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 18113 invoked by uid 22791); 29 May 2009 09:09:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 May 2009 09:09:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 18233 invoked from network); 29 May 2009 09:09:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wind.localnet) (vladimir@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 29 May 2009 09:09:12 -0000 From: Vladimir Prus To: "Pierre Muller" Subject: Re: TR: ARI warning list change Fri May 29 01:53:26 UTC 2009 Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:09:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.90 (Linux/2.6.24-24-generic; KDE/4.2.68; i686; svn-948090; 2009-04-01) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, "'Thiago Jung Bauermann'" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <000001c9e02a$034bb030$09e31090$@u-strasbg.fr> <200905291140.18693.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <000601c9e037$de6565a0$9b3030e0$@u-strasbg.fr> In-Reply-To: <000601c9e037$de6565a0$9b3030e0$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200905291309.11553.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00618.txt.bz2 On Friday 29 May 2009 12:31:30 Pierre Muller wrote: > > > Objet : ARI warning list change Fri May 29 01:53:26 UTC 2009 > > > > > > 657a658,659 > > > > gdb/mi/mi-cmd-var.c:251: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be > > marked > > > I am missing context on this email, but at least in MI, it's not yet > > clear > > which messages should be i18n and which are not. Some are results of > > frontend > > coding bug and as such should be never presented to user and should not > > be > > ever translated. And if they are translated, they won't help the user > > but > > will make it harder to understand the error for developer. > > > You are probably right... I don't know much about mi... > > Should this warning disappear for mi directory altogether, > or should we add a /* ARI: _ markup */ to silence gdb_ari.sh > where translation is discouraged? > > Pierre > > PS: Could you take care of the missing "_()" > in gdb/varobj.c source? I don't really know what is "missing". Am I supposed to grep for such, or there's a list of suspect places already? > > I think that these are the kind of patches that can go in > as obvious, as all mechanical ARI fixes. I *clearly* miss some context. What is "ARI"? What is this automated inspection thing? Where are results of such inspection posted? - Volodya