Re: [Prec/RFA] fix build error of prec in cygwin

[Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>]

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:31:18AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>--- a/i386-linux-tdep.c
>+++ b/i386-linux-tdep.c
>@@ -586,6 +586,14 @@ static int i386_linux_sc_reg_offset[] =
> #define I386_LINUX_RECORD_IOCTL_TIOCSHAYESESP		0x545F
> #define I386_LINUX_RECORD_IOCTL_FIOQSIZE		0x5460
> 
>+/* The values of the second argument of system call "sys_fcntl"
>+   and "sys_fcntl64".  The values of these macros were obtained from
>+   Linux Kernel source.  */
>+#define I386_LINUX_RECORD_FCNTL_F_GETLK			5
>+#define I386_LINUX_RECORD_FCNTL_F_GETLK64		12
>+#define I386_LINUX_RECORD_FCNTL_F_SETLK64		13
>+#define I386_LINUX_RECORD_FCNTL_F_SETLKW64		14
>+
> static void
> i386_linux_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
> {
>@@ -781,6 +789,12 @@ i386_linux_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info
>     I386_LINUX_RECORD_IOCTL_TIOCSHAYESESP;
>   i386_linux_record_tdep.ioctl_FIOQSIZE = I386_LINUX_RECORD_IOCTL_FIOQSIZE;
> 
>+  i386_linux_record_tdep.fcntl_F_GETLK = I386_LINUX_RECORD_FCNTL_F_GETLK;
>+  i386_linux_record_tdep.fcntl_F_GETLK64 = I386_LINUX_RECORD_FCNTL_F_GETLK64;
>+  i386_linux_record_tdep.fcntl_F_SETLK64 = I386_LINUX_RECORD_FCNTL_F_SETLK64;
>+  i386_linux_record_tdep.fcntl_F_SETLKW64 =
>+    I386_LINUX_RECORD_FCNTL_F_SETLKW64;
>+
>   i386_linux_record_tdep.arg1 = I386_EBX_REGNUM;
>   i386_linux_record_tdep.arg2 = I386_ECX_REGNUM;
>   i386_linux_record_tdep.arg3 = I386_EDX_REGNUM;
>--- a/linux-record.c
>+++ b/linux-record.c
>@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ record_linux_system_call (int num, struc
> 	{
> 	  printf_unfiltered (_("Process record and replay target doesn't "
> 			       "support ioctl request 0x%08x.\n"),
>-			     tmpu32);
>+			     (int)tmpu32);

How did a 0x%08x make it into the source after the "2009/04/17 15:44:28"
change which changed all %p's to host_address_to_string?  Shouldn't
this just be a call to host_address_to_string?

> 	  return 1;
> 	}
>       break;
>@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ record_linux_system_call (int num, struc
>       /* XXX */
>       regcache_raw_read (regcache, tdep->arg2, (gdb_byte *) & tmpu32);
>     sys_fcntl:
>-      if (tmpu32 == F_GETLK)
>+      if (tmpu32 == tdep->fcntl_F_GETLK)
> 	{
> 	  regcache_raw_read (regcache, tdep->arg3,
> 			     (gdb_byte *) & tmpu32);
>@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ record_linux_system_call (int num, struc
> 		    "It will free the memory addr = 0x%s len = %d.  "
> 		    "It will make record target get error.  "
> 		    "Do you want to stop the program?"),
>-		  paddr_nz (tmpu32), len);
>+		  paddr_nz (tmpu32), (int)len);

If len is a uint32_t isn't casting it to an int the wrong thing to do?
Looking at the code, len is first defined as uint32_t, then a pointer to
it is cast as (gdb_byte *) (and it doesn't look like the space following
the '&' doesn't follow GNU coding standards).  So it is never actually
used as a uint32_t.  That doesn't seem right.

> 	target_terminal_inferior ();
> 	if (q)
> 	  return 1;
>@@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ record_linux_system_call (int num, struc
> 	default:
> 	  printf_unfiltered (_("Process record and replay target "
> 			       "doesn't support socketcall call 0x%08x\n"),
>-			     tmpu32);
>+			     (int)tmpu32);

Same observation.  This cast seems wrong.

> 	  return -1;
> 	  break;
> 	}
>@@ -1631,20 +1631,17 @@ record_linux_system_call (int num, struc
>       /* sys_fcntl64 */
>     case 221:
>       regcache_raw_read (regcache, tdep->arg2, (gdb_byte *) & tmpu32);
>-      switch (tmpu32)
>-	{
>-	case F_GETLK64:
>+      if (tmpu32 == tdep->fcntl_F_GETLK64)
>+        {
> 	  regcache_raw_read (regcache, tdep->arg3,
> 			     (gdb_byte *) & tmpu32);
> 	  if (record_arch_list_add_mem (tmpu32, tdep->size_flock64))
> 	    return -1;
>-	  break;
>-	case F_SETLK64:
>-	case F_SETLKW64:
>-	  break;
>-	default:
>+	}
>+      else if (tmpu32 != tdep->fcntl_F_SETLK64
>+	       && tmpu32 != tdep->fcntl_F_SETLKW64)
>+        {
> 	  goto sys_fcntl;
>-	  break;
> 	}
>       break;
> 
>@@ -1786,7 +1783,8 @@ record_linux_system_call (int num, struc
> 		fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> 				    "Process record: error reading memory "
> 				    "at addr = 0x%s len = %d.\n",
>-				    paddr_nz (tmpu32), nr * tdep->size_int);
>+				    paddr_nz (tmpu32),
>+				    (int)(nr * tdep->size_int));

...and so on...
> 	      return -1;
> 	    }
> 	  for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
>@@ -2196,7 +2194,7 @@ record_linux_system_call (int num, struc
>     default:
>       printf_unfiltered (_("Process record and replay target doesn't "
> 			   "support syscall number 0x%08x\n"),
>-			 tmpu32);
>+			 (int)tmpu32);

...and so on...