Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix `return' of long/long-long results with no 	debuginfo
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090221155750.GA2144@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902211343.n1LDhidm020789@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:43:44 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > It has been proven by the original bugreport even experienced
> > programmers will make a mistake forgetting about the type cast.
> 
> And I' say it again.  You're doing such users a far bigger favour by
> distributing libraries with debug information. than with bloating gdb
> with code to work around issues.

Fedora GDB already has a custom patch to make this more easy:
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/rpms/gdb/devel/gdb-6.6-buildid-locate.patch?view=co
$ gdb --args sleep 1h
GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc10)
[...]
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...
(no debugging symbols found)
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install coreutils-6.12-18.fc10.x86_64
(gdb) q
$ gdb -q ./main
(gdb) r
Starting program: /md1/home/lace/src/main 
Program exited normally.
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.9-3.x86_64
(gdb) q

Still you can find in the bugreport(s) people do not do it:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111

Mostly cited reason is that debuginfo files are currently too big, which is
being actively worked on:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DebugInfoRevamp

The state of the debugging is not perfect but I hope Fedora does the best
effort it can for it instead of turning down patches without even giving
a reason now.


Regards,
Jan


      reply	other threads:[~2009-02-21 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-11 19:45 Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-11 20:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-11 20:50   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-11 21:23     ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-11 21:47       ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-11 21:58         ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-11 22:08           ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-11 22:38             ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-11 22:50               ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-03 18:10                 ` Tom Tromey
2009-03-04 21:29                   ` Mark Kettenis
2009-03-05  0:15                     ` Tom Tromey
2009-03-09  1:55                       ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-09 22:38                         ` Mark Kettenis
2009-03-11 16:49                           ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-11 20:23                             ` Tom Tromey
2009-03-11 21:48                               ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-13 19:50                                 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-13 23:00                                   ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-14 10:45                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-14 22:09                                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-14 22:18                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-15  9:22                                       ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-15 18:15                                         ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-18  4:36                                           ` Pedro Alves
2009-03-18 14:44                                             ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-18 15:39                                             ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-18 15:46                                               ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-11 22:44         ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-12  9:41           ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-12 14:36             ` Pierre Muller
2009-02-12 14:44               ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-14 21:59             ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-21 12:47           ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-21 13:44             ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-21 15:58   ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-21 16:21     ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-21 16:32       ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090221155750.GA2144@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox