From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix `return' of long/long-long results with no debuginfo
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902112040.n1BKdxb3028188@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090211194511.GA9324@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (message from Jan Kratochvil on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:45:11 +0100)
> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:45:11 +0100
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> the command `return' assumes `int' result when the current function has no
> debug info. This assumption breaks for example `void *' return on x86_64.
>
> Original bugreport: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111
>
> Regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> This testcase also covers the previous fix of the `return' crash:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00213.html
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jan
Sorry, this is wrong. Functions without return type implicitly return int.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-11 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-11 19:45 Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-11 20:40 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2009-02-11 20:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-11 21:23 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-11 21:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-11 21:58 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-11 22:08 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-11 22:38 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-11 22:50 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-03 18:10 ` Tom Tromey
2009-03-04 21:29 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-03-05 0:15 ` Tom Tromey
2009-03-09 1:55 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-09 22:38 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-03-11 16:49 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-11 20:23 ` Tom Tromey
2009-03-11 21:48 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-13 19:50 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-13 23:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-14 10:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-14 22:09 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-14 22:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-15 9:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-15 18:15 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-18 4:36 ` Pedro Alves
2009-03-18 14:44 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-18 15:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-03-18 15:46 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-11 22:44 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-12 9:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-12 14:36 ` Pierre Muller
2009-02-12 14:44 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-14 21:59 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-21 12:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-21 13:44 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-21 15:58 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-21 16:21 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-21 16:32 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902112040.n1BKdxb3028188@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox