Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Vinay Sridhar <vinay@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch] Fix gdb failure to access tls data for parent 	thread
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090217132951.GA32041@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234849907.4215.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:21:47AM +0530, Vinay Sridhar wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 10:04 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 03:54:28PM +0530, Vinay Sridhar wrote:
> > > I was able to recreate this against a gcc compiled binary, so I guess
> > > the omp implementation isnt an issue here.
> > 
> > OK, then we're back to my earlier question:
> > 
> > > The private info is set in attach_thread.  That is supposed to be
> > > called for every thread; how did you get a thread on the thread list
> > > that did not have this routine called?  A breakpoint on add_thread
> > > and add_thread_with_info will probably figure this out.
> > 
> 
> Same response. add_thread_with_info () is not called for parent thread. 

That doesn't answer the question, sorry.  At some point, add_thread
(not add_thread_with_info) must have been called.  Where did that
happen?

> Could this be related? :
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-03/msg00266.html

I don't think so.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-17 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-09  8:47 Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-04 13:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-11  8:33   ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-11 15:53     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-12  5:45       ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-16  3:19         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-16 15:04           ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-16 15:20             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-17  7:01               ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-17 16:20                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2009-02-20  8:31                   ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-23  0:17                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-23  9:20                       ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-23 16:10                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-24  7:11                           ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 13:33                             ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-24 13:39                               ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-24 17:16                               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-24 18:52                                 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 18:58                                   ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-25 18:28                                     ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-27 21:49                                       ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 10:57                           ` Vinay Sridhar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090217132951.GA32041@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vinay@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox