Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Vinay Sridhar <vinay@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch] Fix gdb failure to access tls data for parent 	thread
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090215182233.GA24660@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234417406.6489.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:13:26AM +0530, Vinay Sridhar wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:53 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:01:08PM +0530, Vinay Sridhar wrote:
> > > Daniel,
> > > 
> > > Sorry for the late response. I can confirm that attach_thread is not
> > > called on the parent thread. The test case I had listed in my earlier
> > > mail uses OMP for thread creation. Could that have something to do with
> > > this?
> > 
> > Well, it shouldn't; libgomp uses the normal POSIX thread interfaces.
> > I assume you're using GCC -fopenmp, right?  Or is this another OpenMP
> > implementation?
> > 
> 
> I used IBM's XLC compiler which has an inbuilt OpenMP implementation.

Sorry for the delay, I missed your message.

In that case, you need to determine whether it is using POSIX threads
or whether it is using clone directly and ignoring the thread library.
If it is not using the POSIX threads library, how is it handling TLS
inside the threads?  If it is using pthread_create, why didn't we get
a notification about it?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-15 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-09  8:47 Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-04 13:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-11  8:33   ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-11 15:53     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-12  5:45       ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-16  3:19         ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2009-02-16 15:04           ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-16 15:20             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-17  7:01               ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-17 16:20                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-20  8:31                   ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-23  0:17                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-23  9:20                       ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-23 16:10                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-24  7:11                           ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 13:33                             ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-24 13:39                               ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-24 17:16                               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-24 18:52                                 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 18:58                                   ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-25 18:28                                     ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-27 21:49                                       ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 10:57                           ` Vinay Sridhar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090215182233.GA24660@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vinay@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox