From: Vinay Sridhar <vinay@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch] Fix gdb failure to access tls data for parent thread
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235102359.4719.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090217132951.GA32041@caradoc.them.org>
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 08:29 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:21:47AM +0530, Vinay Sridhar wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 10:04 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 03:54:28PM +0530, Vinay Sridhar wrote:
> > > > I was able to recreate this against a gcc compiled binary, so I guess
> > > > the omp implementation isnt an issue here.
> > >
> > > OK, then we're back to my earlier question:
> > >
> > > > The private info is set in attach_thread. That is supposed to be
> > > > called for every thread; how did you get a thread on the thread list
> > > > that did not have this routine called? A breakpoint on add_thread
> > > > and add_thread_with_info will probably figure this out.
> > >
> >
> > Same response. add_thread_with_info () is not called for parent thread.
>
> That doesn't answer the question, sorry. At some point, add_thread
> (not add_thread_with_info) must have been called. Where did that
> happen?
>
> > Could this be related? :
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-03/msg00266.html
>
> I don't think so.
>
I placed a break on "add_thread" as you suggested. It doesn't seem to be
hit at all, for any of the threads.
BTW, I'm using GNU gdb (GDB) 6.8.50.20090216.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-20 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-09 8:47 Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-04 13:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-11 8:33 ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-11 15:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-12 5:45 ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-16 3:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-16 15:04 ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-16 15:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-17 7:01 ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-17 16:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-20 8:31 ` Vinay Sridhar [this message]
2009-02-23 0:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-23 9:20 ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-23 16:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-24 7:11 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 13:33 ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-24 13:39 ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-24 17:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-24 18:52 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 18:58 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-25 18:28 ` Vinay Sridhar
2009-02-27 21:49 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-24 10:57 ` Vinay Sridhar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1235102359.4719.3.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=vinay@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox