Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
	Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
		msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] [patch] 'info symbol' to print more info
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081117193531.GA17547@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0811171112x5b555146lefb27f36e773ac25@mail.gmail.com>

This discussion seems to have wandered far afield from Paul's
reasonable patch :-(

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:12:45AM -0800, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> > For instance, there was this discussion
> > about not printing the name of the objfile if MULTI_OBJFILE_P. If we
> > get rid of that, does it reduce the number of cases?
> 
> I think the answer is no, because we still have to check for:
> 
> 	    && osect->objfile && osect->objfile->name

I suspect that can be an assert, or you could use "<unnamed objfile>".
If that helps.  I can't imagine where we'd get an objfile section
without an objfile.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-17 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-15 16:15 Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-11-15 17:00 ` Michael Snyder
2008-11-15 17:22   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-11-15 18:51     ` Michael Snyder
2008-11-15 23:16       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-11-15 23:35         ` Andreas Schwab
2008-11-16  1:35         ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-16  1:38           ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-11-16  8:20             ` Joel Brobecker
2008-11-17 22:37               ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-11-17 23:35                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-11-18 16:07                   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-11-18 19:55                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-19  4:20                     ` Joel Brobecker
2008-11-19 12:45                       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-11-15 17:40 ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081117193531.GA17547@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox