From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA/commit/dwarf] Create partial symbols for nested subprograms
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080910203437.GA26162@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080910201959.GC10133@adacore.com>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 01:19:59PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I stumbled on this because I am about to remove the piece of code
> mentioned above (in ada_lookup_symbol_list), as it introduces
> a pretty significant performance penalty - I will post a separate
> patch with more details later on. But at the same time, I think
> it is important by itself, as I want the partial symtab and full
> symtab to be consistent.
>
> 2008-09-10 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>
> * dwarf2read.c (add_partial_subprogram): New procedure.
> (scan_partial_symbols): Use it.
> (load_partial_dies): Read in children of subprogram and lexical
> blocks.
:-(
Do you have any performance data for GDB startup with this change?
Not that I see any useful way around it, if subprograms really can be
children of lexical blocks. But it's going to cause us to read in a
ton more DIEs, including all scopes and local variables.
The lexical block check won't work as is; we'd walk children of
lexical blocks, except we'll never read one in the first place.
See the skip_one_die call earlier in load_partial_dies.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-10 20:20 Joel Brobecker
2008-09-10 20:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-09-10 21:38 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-11 5:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-11 22:15 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-11 22:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-11 22:33 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-12 4:19 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-11 17:55 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-11 18:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-11 21:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-13 15:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-13 22:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-11 22:44 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-12 4:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-12 16:51 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-12 16:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-12 17:19 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-12 17:43 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-12 18:08 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-12 18:43 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-09-12 20:31 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080910203437.GA26162@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox