Re: [RFA/commit/dwarf] Create partial symbols for nested subprograms

[Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>]

>>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:

Daniel> Not that I see any useful way around it, if subprograms really
Daniel> can be children of lexical blocks.

Tom> Can we do it only for languages where we know this can occur?
Tom> IOW, Ada?

Joel> That's what I was going to propose, but I wanted to do some measurement
Joel> too (tomorrow). Nested subprograms are possible in C, and aren't they
Joel> also available in C++? I don't mind supporting this only in Ada, though.

GNU C has nested functions.  Standard C does not.  I wrote a simple
test case and compiled it with GCC.  The resulting DWARF (I appended a
snippet) does not nest functions here .. but perhaps this is a bug in
GCC, I couldn't say.

I don't know the situation with C++.

Tom


 <0><b>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit)
  < c>     DW_AT_stmt_list   : 0	
  <10>     DW_AT_high_pc     : 0x17	
  <14>     DW_AT_low_pc      : 0	
  <18>     DW_AT_producer    : GNU C 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)	
  <40>     DW_AT_language    : 1	(ANSI C)
  <41>     DW_AT_name        : q.c	
  <45>     DW_AT_comp_dir    : /tmp	
 <1><4a>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
  <4b>     DW_AT_sibling     : <84>	
  <4f>     DW_AT_external    : 1	
  <50>     DW_AT_name        : outer	
  <56>     DW_AT_decl_file   : 1	
  <57>     DW_AT_decl_line   : 2	
  <58>     DW_AT_prototyped  : 1	
  <59>     DW_AT_type        : <84>	
  <5d>     DW_AT_low_pc      : 0	
  <61>     DW_AT_high_pc     : 0xd	
  <65>     DW_AT_frame_base  : 0	(location list)
 <2><69>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
  <6a>     DW_AT_name        : inner	
  <70>     DW_AT_decl_file   : 1	
  <71>     DW_AT_decl_line   : 3	
  <72>     DW_AT_prototyped  : 1	
  <73>     DW_AT_type        : <84>	
  <77>     DW_AT_low_pc      : 0xd	
  <7b>     DW_AT_high_pc     : 0x17	
  <7f>     DW_AT_frame_base  : 0x2c	(location list)