Re: [RFA] gdb_continue_to_breakpoint

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 01:52:40PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> This one-line change affects two changes that make
> gdb_continue_to_breakpoint more useful.
>
> 1) If we accept "Breakpoint in" as well as "Breakpoint at",
> then it will work for non-debug functions.
>
> 2) If we accept trailing text after the $location_pattern,
> then we are not forced to include a location pattern that
> takes us up to the end of the line.
>

> 2008-09-04  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@vmware.com>
> 
> 	* lib/gdb.exp (gdb_continue_to_breakpoint): Accept "in" as well
> 	as "at" (for non-debug functions such as _start).  Also accept
> 	trailing text after $location_pattern.

I dunno - when we get symbol handling confused, e.g. we can find a
minsym but not the full symbol, we tend to get the wrong output from
breakpoint messages.  For the second part can you just put the .* at
appropriate callers?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery