Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [non-stop] 01/10 Add "executing" property
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080616012617.GA8944@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u3anel69s.fsf@gnu.org>

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:47:43AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > 	* Makefile.in (event-top.o, frame.o, inf-loop.o, top.o):
> > 	Update.
> 
> I think you should tell what prerequisites were added to each target.
> A simple "update" will never reveal when a prerequisite was added, if
> someone will ever want to know.

I don't think it's necessary to duplicate the contents of the patch in
the changelog.  Do you really think it's useful?  We've never asked to
do this (see the cvs log of Makefile.in for plenty of examples), and I
would resist; changelogs already take a long time to write.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-16  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-15 21:04 Pedro Alves
2008-06-15 22:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-06-16  1:42   ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-06-16  3:23     ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-06-16  6:45       ` ChangeLog entries [was Re: [non-stop] 01/10 Add "executing" property] Nick Roberts
2008-06-16  7:22     ` [non-stop] 01/10 Add "executing" property Vladimir Prus
2008-06-17  0:40       ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-06-17 17:10         ` Vladimir Prus
2008-06-17 20:38           ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-06-23 17:27       ` Tom Tromey
2008-06-17 16:14   ` Joel Brobecker
2008-06-17 18:24     ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-06-17 18:32       ` Joel Brobecker
2008-06-18  0:22         ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-06-17 18:34       ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-17 20:58         ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-06-23  1:13         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-06-23 11:54           ` Vladimir Prus
2008-06-23 14:41             ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-23 18:22               ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-06-23 18:25                 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-06-23 19:52                   ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-24  1:13                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-06-23 18:14             ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-02  3:29           ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-25 19:02 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-06-25 19:13   ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-25 19:22     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-06-26 13:37       ` Vladimir Prus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080616012617.GA8944@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox