From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28291 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2008 01:26:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 28281 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jun 2008 01:26:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:26:21 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7663B9840B; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:26:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EAC98011; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:26:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K83U9-0002Pc-Si; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:26:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [non-stop] 01/10 Add "executing" property Message-ID: <20080616012617.GA8944@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200806152203.14626.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00298.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:47:43AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > * Makefile.in (event-top.o, frame.o, inf-loop.o, top.o): > > Update. > > I think you should tell what prerequisites were added to each target. > A simple "update" will never reveal when a prerequisite was added, if > someone will ever want to know. I don't think it's necessary to duplicate the contents of the patch in the changelog. Do you really think it's useful? We've never asked to do this (see the cvs log of Makefile.in for plenty of examples), and I would resist; changelogs already take a long time to write. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery