From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] Relax "printf" function name check in annota* test cases
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 12:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080515003926.GA3331@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805142245.m4EMjopF021777@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:45:50AM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> B.t.w. even if we were to handle versioned symbols (I have a patch
> for that), the original annota test cases would still break --
> because the function would then be called printf@GLIBC...
Ok, thanks. This patch sounds like the right thing to me then!
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-15 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-15 0:37 Ulrich Weigand
2008-05-15 0:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-15 0:54 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-05-15 12:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-05-16 15:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080515003926.GA3331@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox