From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2909 invoked by alias); 15 May 2008 00:39:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 2900 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2008 00:39:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 May 2008 00:39:30 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CFF983FA; Thu, 15 May 2008 00:39:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2012983F9; Thu, 15 May 2008 00:39:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JwRVG-0000sB-Ud; Wed, 14 May 2008 20:39:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 12:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Relax "printf" function name check in annota* test cases Message-ID: <20080515003926.GA3331@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080514220055.GA27367@caradoc.them.org> <200805142245.m4EMjopF021777@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805142245.m4EMjopF021777@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00457.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:45:50AM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > B.t.w. even if we were to handle versioned symbols (I have a patch > for that), the original annota test cases would still break -- > because the function would then be called printf@GLIBC... Ok, thanks. This patch sounds like the right thing to me then! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery