From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] Relax "printf" function name check in annota* test cases
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 00:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080514220055.GA27367@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805142136.m4ELaM2F018037@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:36:22PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this patch fixes the last regression after Alan's patch was applied:
> some sub-tests of annota1.exp and annota3.exp are now failing because
> when stopped at the "printf" breakpoint, the current function is not
> called printf, but printf@plt.
This is unrelated to the annota tests, as you said... but the
breakpoint is at "printf", isn't it? Why are we stopping at
printf@plt instead of the definition when we know glibc is loaded?
Maybe this comes back to the two names trouble?
I have no objection to relaxing this test but I'm wondering if we need
another.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-14 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-15 0:37 Ulrich Weigand
2008-05-15 0:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-05-15 0:54 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-05-15 12:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-16 15:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080514220055.GA27367@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox