Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com (Jan Kratochvil)
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org
Subject: Overlay support broken (Re: [patch] [2/2] Discontiguous PSYMTABs (psymtabs->symtabs by addrmap))
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 22:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805121945.m4CJjdYd031485@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080423213059.GC11894@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> from "Jan Kratochvil" at Apr 23, 2008 11:30:59 PM

Jan Kratochvil wrote:

> 	* symtab.c: Include "addrmap.h"
> 	(find_pc_sect_psymtab): Support reading the field PSYMTABS_ADDRMAP.
> 	Move the psymtab locator into ...
> 	(find_pc_sect_psymtab_closer): ... a new function.

It appears this change broke overlay support.  In fact, it looks like the
main idea of this patch is fundamentally incompatible with overlays:

> +    /* Map addresses to the entries of PSYMTABS.  It would be more efficient to
> +       have a map per the whole process but ADDRMAP cannot selectively remove
> +       its items during FREE_OBJFILE.  This mapping is already present even for
> +       PARTIAL_SYMTABs which still have no corresponding full SYMTABs read.  */
> +
> +    struct addrmap *psymtabs_addrmap;

In the presence of overlays, a single address can map to *multiple* PSYMTABS
corresponding to multiple overlay segments optionally loaded at that address.

The old code chose between them using the "section" argument to 
find_pc_sect_psymtab; it seems the new code just ignores this argument:

  /* Try just the PSYMTABS_ADDRMAP mapping first as it has better granularity
     than the later used TEXTLOW/TEXTHIGH one.  */

  ALL_OBJFILES (objfile)
    if (objfile->psymtabs_addrmap != NULL)
      {
        struct partial_symtab *pst;

        pst = addrmap_find (objfile->psymtabs_addrmap, pc);
        if (pst != NULL)
          {
            /* We do not try to call FIND_PC_SECT_PSYMTAB_CLOSER as
               PSYMTABS_ADDRMAP we used has already the best 1-byte
               granularity and FIND_PC_SECT_PSYMTAB_CLOSER may mislead us into
               a worse chosen section due to the TEXTLOW/TEXTHIGH ranges
               overlap.  */

            return pst;
          }
      }


Any suggestions how to fix this?

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-12 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-09 18:17 [patch] Parse DW_AT_ranges into PSYMTABS (for childless CU, for vDSO32) Jan Kratochvil
2007-10-09 18:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-09 18:59   ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-10-09 19:13     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-24 15:43       ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-11-25 14:48         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-30  7:42         ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-30 11:10           ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-11-30 14:56             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-30 15:09               ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-12-01  0:55               ` Jim Blandy
2007-12-01 17:30                 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-12-09 20:40               ` [patch] Discontiguous PSYMTABs [Re: [patch] Parse DW_AT_ranges into PSYMTABS (for childless CU, for vDSO32)] Jan Kratochvil
2007-12-10  0:21                 ` [patch] Removal of the FIND_PC_SECT_PSYMTAB search [Re: [patch] Discontiguous PSYMTABs] Jan Kratochvil
2007-12-17  1:02                 ` [patch] Discontiguous PSYMTABs [Re: [patch] Parse DW_AT_ranges into PSYMTABS (for childless CU, for vDSO32)] Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-17  1:03                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-17  2:41                     ` [patch] Discontiguous PSYMTABs Jan Kratochvil
2007-12-17  3:41                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-23 22:15                     ` [patch] [0/2] " Jan Kratochvil
2008-04-23 22:18                     ` [patch] [1/2] Discontiguous PSYMTABs (partial DIEs base address) Jan Kratochvil
2008-05-01 19:43                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-23 22:24                     ` [patch] [2/2] Discontiguous PSYMTABs (psymtabs->symtabs by addrmap) Jan Kratochvil
2008-05-01 19:46                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-04 17:38                         ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-05-12 22:24                       ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2008-05-12 22:37                         ` Overlay support broken (Re: [patch] [2/2] Discontiguous PSYMTABs (psymtabs->symtabs by addrmap)) Michael Snyder
2008-05-13  1:39                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-13  3:17                             ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-05-13 15:37                             ` Doug Evans
2008-05-13 15:42                             ` Michael Snyder
2008-05-13 15:31                           ` Doug Evans
2008-05-12 23:52                         ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-05-13 18:45                           ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-05-13 19:08                             ` Pedro Alves
2008-05-13 19:01                               ` Pedro Alves
2008-05-13 19:11                               ` Michael Snyder
2008-05-15 16:39                             ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-05-15 18:16                               ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-05-15 18:44                                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-15 19:06                                   ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-05-16 18:32                                   ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-05-15 19:18                               ` Michael Snyder
2008-04-23 21:31                 ` [patch] Discontiguous PSYMTABs [Re: [patch] Parse DW_AT_ranges into PSYMTABS (for childless CU, for vDSO32)] Doug Evans
2008-04-23 21:31                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-05-14  1:11 Overlay support broken (Re: [patch] [2/2] Discontiguous PSYMTABs (psymtabs->symtabs by addrmap)) Ulrich Weigand
2008-05-14  8:07 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200805121945.m4CJjdYd031485@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox